Laserfiche WebLink
Item#09-CCAgenda-OS/14/07 <br /> ' ' ' 1: File#07-3259[Toml Pages 41] <br /> �i.�-�� <br /> MINUTES OF TIiE <br /> � ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION . <br /> � Tuesday,February 20,2007 � <br /> 6:00 dclocic p.m. . <br /> Zullo stated there are otl�er areas that hardcover could possibly be reduced. Zullo statecl in her view <br /> the setback frorn tlie road is one of tlle main issues. . <br /> Rahn inquired whether the applicants would like the Planning Commission to vote o��the application � <br /> or to table the application. <br /> racobson stated lie�voulcl like his application to move forward in the process as e�ciently as possible. <br /> Gaffi•on stated if there is going to be a redesign, unless it is very basic, it should come back before the <br /> . Planning Cornmission and tltat in his opinion there are other areas where the hardcover could be <br /> removed. � � <br /> Rahn stated there are a number of design issues t(iat could be considered. . � � <br /> JacoUson stated tliere are a i�umber of factors that have gone into the design. One,the exist'ing garage � <br /> is a sound structure wifh a good foundation;two,the liouse in its current location;three,access from � ' <br /> the garage to the house. . <br /> Rahn commei�ted the square footage between the house and the garage could be moved or lessened, <br /> which goes to the design. � � <br /> Kathy Gangstee stated the piece tl�ey took off the�back was the same square footage and that tlle <br /> hardcover is being reduced with their proposal. <br /> Gaffron stated page five of the sta�ff report addresses the hardcover in the 75-250 foot zone. Gaffron <br /> stated this proposal is really requesting a total of 34.7 percent and tllat the other lots referenced were <br /> not�-anted hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone. . � : , � <br /> � lacobson stated there are certainly other approvals that have been granted that are similar to what is � � <br /> , being presented here today without rec�uiring the house to be relocated fiu-ther back. Jacobson stated � . • <br /> this property is fundamentally differentthan otl�ec properties and should be judged on its own merits. <br /> Rahn suggested the application be tlbled for redesi?n. Rahn recommended the variance to the front <br /> � yard setback be elirninated. <br /> � Kempf stated he also has a�� issue�vith the pooi being as close to Lake Minnetotilca as it is. <br /> . � PAGE 23 � . <br />