My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2008 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
03-17-2008 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2012 8:23:29 AM
Creation date
7/27/2012 8:23:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r . . <br /> Kroeger sta.ted typically pools are not located on the north side of a house. <br /> Chair Kempf opened the public hearing at 6:39 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Kempf closed the public heazing at 6:39 p.m. � <br /> (#07-3335 Douglas and Margaret Franchot,Continued) <br /> Kempf indicated he is willing to make a motion to ta.ble the application until the primary and alternative <br /> septic sites are identified and tested. Kempf recommended the pool be pulled back away from the street <br /> as far as possible and to not use the building as screening for the pool. Kempf sta.ted in his opinion there <br /> is a reason why outbuildings are not located in front of a principal structure and that the applicant will <br /> need to look at significant screening to minimize the impact of the pool and building on the <br /> neighborhood if it is kept in its proposed location. <br /> Franchot stated he is amenable to Chair Kempf's motion with the exception of relocating the pool and <br /> asked what their options are if they do not move the pool. ' <br /> Kempf stated the whole purpose of the City's ordinance is to prohibit buildings from being located <br /> ahead of the principal residence,and that even if this application is recommended for denial by the <br /> Planning Commission,the applicant can still proceed forward to the City Council. <br /> Franchot stated he does understand Chair Kempf's comments regarding the location and that they would <br /> be willing to have their application tabled at the present time. <br /> Kroeger stated in consideration of the fact that Colin Drive is a private roadway,the proposed location <br /> is the absolute farthest location from any neighbor's house, and that the variance is to the road and not <br /> . to setbacks,he would not be opposed to granting the variance. Kroeger stated the issue then becomes <br /> one of aesthetics from the street and whether that is more desirable than having the pool located closer <br /> to one of the neighbor's homes. <br /> Schwingler indicated he is in agreement with Commissioner Kroeger,and recommended that some <br /> landscaping be incorporated into the applicant's plan prior to the application being brought back before <br /> the Planning Commission. <br /> Kempf moved,Winer seconded,to table Application#07-3335,Douglas and Margaret Franchot, <br /> 2010 Colin Drive. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.