Laserfiche WebLink
1 , <br /> FILE#08-3335 <br /> 12 March 2008 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> Planning Staff has not changed the position of recommending denial. A conforming � <br /> location exists behind the home where a pool can be constructed and does not require <br /> variances. The Applicants' have reasonable use of the property in the home. A pool is .. <br /> an amenity and considered a luxury item. To grant a variance for the location of a pool <br /> on this property is in direct opposition to intent of the Zoning Code. . , <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission feel that the applicants have reasonable use of � <br /> the property without the pool and pool building? <br /> 2. Is the Planning Commission satisfied that there is no other appropriate location <br /> for the pool which would meet the required setbacks? ' <br /> 3. Does the Planning Commission feel that the proposed pool building is <br /> reasonable, and in a reasonable location? <br /> 4. Does the Planning Commission feel that screening is necessary? If so, what <br /> type? <br /> 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation � <br /> Planning Staff recommends denial of the setback variance to allow the in-ground pool to , <br /> and pool building to be constructed closer to the street than the home. Should the <br /> Planning Commission feel that the proposed location is appropriate; the Planning <br /> Commission should outline the specific findin.gs for approval. <br /> , <br /> ; <br /> � <br /> 3 � <br />