My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
11-14-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:20:08 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 4:08:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(6. 11 -3528 TIMOTHYAND DANIELLE KOEHLER, 4205 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, <br />Continued) <br />numbers result in an unexpectedly high level of hardcover within the 75 -250 foot zone, Staff will bring <br />the revised numbers back to Council for review. <br />Timothy Koehler stated he does not have anything to add to Staffs report and that he is fine with Staffs <br />recommendation. <br />McMillan noted she is okay with three of the four recommendations. McMillan stated as it relates to the <br />250 -500 foot zone, she is okay with additional hardcover due to the turnaround situation as long as it <br />stays under 30 percent. Given the fact that there are not firm hardcover numbers for the 75 -250 foot zone, <br />in her view the applicant should conform to the previous resolution. The applicant could reduce the size <br />of the outdoor kitchen patio or another area. It appears the patio is nonfunctional and the outdoor <br />storage/kitchen area is in poor shape. McMillan stated in her view it should all conform to the hardcover <br />numbers contained in the previous resolution for that zone. <br />Curtis noted the applicant is requesting is 29.1 percent, which is the number their surveyor arrived at for <br />the survey. The applicant has made adjustments in the landscape plan and the discussion with the <br />Planning Commission was based on the landscape plan since the applicant felt that was what they would <br />like to do. The applicant's surveyor based his numbers off of the site visit and off of the intended changes <br />• to the driveway. The revision to the landscape plan should be consistent with the resolution. <br />McMillan stated if they are tearing out the patio and the outdoor kitchen area, in her view this is the time <br />when the hardcover should be brought into compliance. <br />Koehler noted this is a very small area, and if hardcover is removed from there, it becomes even less <br />functional. They are attempting to replace a patio that was existing since it was not constructed <br />appropriately and they are adding the bare minimum to the driveway. Koehler stated they added gravel at <br />the beginning because it was their understanding that gravel was not considered hardcover. They later <br />found out that it is considered hardcover if it is driven on. <br />Koehler stated at the Planning Commission meeting they spent a fair amount of time figuring out the least <br />obstrusive way to make the necessary improvements. Koehler indicated if they are required to make <br />additional changes, they will not have time to make the improvements this year and they will have to go <br />through another winter with the existing driveway where they are required to back out on to North Shore <br />Drive. Koehler indicated they will lose the functionality of the driveway and the kitchen area. <br />McMillan commented the driveway issue appears to be focused in the 250 -500 foot zone. <br />Koehler indicated it is a two -tier driveway and that currently service trucks refuse to come down to their <br />house due to the steepness of the driveway. They are attempting to add a turnaround to address that issue. <br />McMillan stated she is having a difficult time understanding where the different zones are located. <br />Curtis pointed out the 250 -500 foot zone on the overhead. <br />• McMillan stated she does not have a problem with the piece up by the road. <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.