My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
10-24-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:19:58 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 4:07:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 24, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(9. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (MCWD) PRESENTATION, Continued) <br />Evenson stated the Board has requested he report back at the end of November. <br />Jabbour stated it is important the Council understand that the DNR has been working very hard on Lake <br />Minnetonka and they have managed to bring in a couple of people from the Corps of Engineers to deal <br />with some of these issues. <br />McDermott indicated he is in agreement with that but that there are 10,000 lakes within the state and the <br />DNR has to spread their resources around. <br />McMillan stated another issue is whether AIS management is even effective and should be studied <br />further. McMillan commented she would have liked to have started a program 15 years ago before some <br />of the AIS spread. If a comprehensive AIS management plan is done, there will be an educational benefit <br />derived from it. The LMCD has discussed a vegetation management plan but they do not have the <br />funding for that program, which could perhaps be something the MCWD could handle. <br />Z <br />McMillan commented there are a number of things that could be done and that she would like to look at <br />some different options that could perhaps be included in a resolution. <br />Mattick stated he has not seen this issue beyond Orono but that there is no doubt the MCWD has certain <br />powers and that it is a matter of how far that power extends. The MCWD could perhaps seek special <br />legislation to clarify their role but that he is not sure at this point what the plan is on that. Mattick stated <br />they could study it, figure out what the issues are, and then regulate it. If you do not take some steps to <br />implement a plan, which is likely going to be some type of regulation, it does no good. Mattick stated the <br />MCWD should come forward with some ideas or solutions on how to deal with the issues. <br />Mattick stated it sounds like the City Council supports the investigation and the hiring of the expert to <br />study the issues and then coming up with a plan on how to coordinate the different mechanisms. <br />Evenson stated the Orono Council is struggling with a lot of the same issues that the MCWD has <br />struggled with. What the MCWD is asking for at this time is whether the City would like the MCWD to <br />undertake the planning process. The City will have a chance to participate in this process along with the <br />LMCD, the DNR, sportsman's groups and other entities. The MCWD cannot do it on their own, but they <br />are willing to take on this challenge after hearing from the lake communities. <br />McMillan indicated the City Council will discuss this further and get back to the MCWD. <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - LOREN SCHOENZEIT, REPRESENTATIVE <br />Schoenzeit stated he had nothing to report but would be available for questions. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />Page 10 of 19 <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.