My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
06-13-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:18:12 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 3:56:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 13, 2011 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(PUBLIC COMMENTS, Continued) <br />believes that the City's park and trails will be more heavily used in the future and that the citizens of our <br />neighborhoods will be both thrilled and relieved if the last 100 yards of sidewalk is completed. <br />McMillan recommended the City Engineer review the plans for the sidewalk and report back to the City <br />Council on what has been completed to date. <br />Kellogg indicated he has reviewed the plans recently and that some of the obstacles to completing the <br />second portion of the sidewalk were the steep embankment, likely tree loss, and concerns of the affected <br />property owners about the impact of the sidewalk on their properties. Kellogg indicated he would be glad <br />to discuss it at a future meeting. <br />Rahn asked if it would be feasible to ask the affected property owners whether they would like to proceed <br />forward with the project and if the project can move forward without disturbing their properties. <br />Kellogg stated that would likely be one of the first steps but that the first step that should be taken would <br />be to quantify the impacts to the individual properties. Kellogg indicated he does not want to go to a <br />property owner and say that X amount of their property is required for the project when that is not the <br />case. There is also some newer technology available for retaining soils that could perhaps be utilized. <br />Some soil borings have been completed so there is some information on the type of soils that would be <br />• involved. The majority of the survey work has also been completed. One of the biggest issues is the fact <br />that the utilities are located in the county road. <br />Rahn asked if the idea was to make room for the sidewalk and a trail or just a sidewalk. <br />Kellogg indicated the plan was to make room for continuation of the sidewalk as it goes towards Navarre. <br />Rahn indicated he would be in favor of revisiting that project. <br />McMillan commented to her recollection the second section was more complicated than the first section <br />and that she would be in agreement that the Council should discuss it at a future City Council meeting. <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />*3. #07 -3300 WILLIAM AND NADINE McGUIRE AND JOHN AND LOIS O'MALLEY, <br />290 and 315 WOODHILL ROAD - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - AMEND RESOLUTION <br />NO.- 6053 <br />"Rahn moved, Bremer seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. "6053, a Resolution Amending <br />Resolution No. 5648, for the properties located at 290 and 315 Woodhill Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.