My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
04-11-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:17:07 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 3:53:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 11, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• (8. OLD CRYSTAL BAYROAD RECONSTRUCTIONPLANAND SPECIFICATION <br />APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE, Continued) <br />house last week. McMillan stated there should have been an open house back at the time of the feasibility <br />study. <br />As part of this project the city hall entrance will still be located off of Old Crystal Bay Road. McMillan <br />indicated during this process she attempted to get the entrance off of Kelley Parkway but that it will <br />remain off of Old Crystal Bay Road via the roundabout. <br />McMillan stated this project is taking away money that could be used for other road projects. McMillan <br />indicated she has seen how Willow and Watertown Road have disintegrated this past winter and that those <br />are important projects that should be moved up. The City can go out for more bonds to get Willow done <br />in 2016, but will not pay off the MSA account until 2030 and beyond. McMillan commented that this <br />project is a big use of MSA money. While MSA money is not Orono taxpayer money, it could be used to <br />fix other Orono roads. The residents want their roads fixed. <br />McMillan stated the Council needs to be very cognizant of cost savings and that she would concur that the <br />Council should think about going back to the other option in the feasibility study. McMillan noted she is <br />cognizant of the work that has been completed to date but that the City needs to look at reducing costs. <br />McMillan noted the videotape needs to be changed and that the Council will have a brief recess. <br />• (Recess taken from 9:03 p.m. to 9:08 p.m.) <br />Franchot asked where the half a million dollars was added to this project that Mayor McMillan <br />referenced. <br />McMillan indicated she added the lights into that figure since with the non - roundabout option the lights <br />could be a potential cost reduction. <br />Franchot noted the cost of the lights was included in the feasibility study and was not added to the project. <br />McMillan stated it is difficult to reduce expenses on this project since a number of the items are <br />mandatory with the roundabouts and safety related. <br />Kellogg noted the estimate for the lighting under Option 1 was listed at $240,000. In the roundabout <br />option, the lighting allowance was $288,000, which has been reduced slightly. Kellogg stated those costs <br />were not added after January but were included in the feasibility report as part of the base bid. As it <br />relates to the $144,000 for the additional roundabout, the City will not know the exact cost for that <br />portion of the roadway unless the project is put out for bids. <br />Franchot pointed out the City obtained its AAA bond rating because they have spent money prudently <br />and have paid it back. <br />Olson agreed with Franchot that it is one of the justifications used by Moody's for the AAA rating. <br />• Franchot stated it is also questionable how much of the money that has already been invested could be <br />reused if the project is radically changed. Franchot asked if the open house was such a concern, why the <br />Page 19 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.