My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
03-28-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:16:47 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 3:52:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(7. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION, Continued) <br />A cost analysis has been completed comparing 250 W High Pressure Sodium versus an equivalent LED <br />lamp. The estimated total annual electrical cost for the 29 proposed light poles is $2,997 for the HPS and <br />$1829 for the LED. The initial capital cost for the LED fixtures is slightly higher than the HPS fixture. <br />Based on the capital cost and energy usage only, the estimated payback period is two years if the LED <br />fixtures are utilized. Generally the useful life of a LED lamp is approximately four times the life of a <br />HPS lamp. Considering the capital expenses, energy savings and reduced maintenance, there is an <br />estimated 20 -year life cycle cost savings of approximately $74,000 if LED lamps are used. The LED <br />lights will emit a bluer light whereas the high pressure sodium lights emit more of a yellow light. <br />Bremer asked which lights are becoming more common. <br />Kellogg indicated the LED lights are more popular since they last longer and require less maintenance. <br />The advertised life span of an LED is three to four times longer 'than a high pressure sodium light. LED <br />bulbs simply dim over time and never completely go black. The Public Works Department is in favor of <br />the LED lights. <br />McMillan asked whether any thought has been given to putting the lights on timers. <br />• <br />Kellogg stated he did discuss that with the Public Works Department and that there was some question on <br />what hours the timer would be set for. Kellogg noted the cost savings would be fairly minimal and that <br />there is a cost feature to add timers to the lamps. • <br />McMillan asked whether some of the lights could be put on timers, such as the lights at the crosswalks: a <br />Kellogg stated their electrical engineers have stated you should either light it to industry standards or not <br />at all to avoid the drivers going from dark to light. <br />Franchot asked if the best practice is to turn them on at night and turn them off at daytime. <br />Kellogg noted they would be on photo cells. <br />Franchot suggested the City Council follow best practices with the lights. <br />Printup asked if the light poles are 28 -feet. <br />Kellogg indicated they are. <br />Printup asked what the purpose is for planting trees on the roundabouts. <br />Kellogg stated the landscaping was designed to prevent people from looking at the oncoming traffic when <br />going through the roundabouts and that the lights would be illuminating the roadway. <br />Printup asked whether there will be light poles located on the roundabouts. <br />Kellogg indicated they will not be located in the center island of the roundabout but around the perimeter. <br />Printup stated the feasibility study on page three indicates that the poor condition of the road was the <br />reason that the City elected to move this project up in addition to traffic congestion and safety concerns. <br />Page 8 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.