Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28, 2011 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(7. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION, Continued) <br />Kellogg stated if the Council elects to do the landscaping at a later time, it would need to be done after the <br />road contractor is finished. Kellogg indicated they can either use the existing plans or create a new set of <br />plans. <br />Franchot requested the motion be put to a vote. Franchot noted some of the Council has consistently had <br />problems with the landscaping and that the issue here is more about trying to cancel the landscaping or <br />dramatically reduce it rather than clarifying what will be included as part of the landscaping. Franchot <br />stated in his opinion the time has come for the Council to take a final vote on what the project is going to <br />look like. This project has been discussed thoroughly since last year with the School District and they <br />have gone round and round on the landscaping and nothing new has been raised in that time. Franchot <br />stated he completely disagrees with the characterization that this is a beautification project but rather it is <br />the City doing the project correctly from the start. <br />Franchot noted the landscaping plan has been worked over multiple times and reduced dramatically from <br />what was originally proposed. Franchot recommended the Council vote down Printup's motion and to <br />make a new motion directing staff and the engineers to bring to the City Council the request for bids as <br />the Council has discussed and agreed time and time again. <br />McMillan noted Rahn and Printup were not involved in this project since 2010. <br />• Franchot commented the previous council has made decisions regarding this project, and in the absence of <br />any major issues, the Council should continue to move forward with the project. <br />McMillan stated a major decision was made in January to add the third roundabout to the base bid at a <br />cost of approximately $145,000 and that some of the Council is attempting to make up that difference by <br />cutting other portions of the project. <br />Franchot noted the discussion has been had a number of times and that the Council now needs to make a <br />decision. <br />Rahn stated in his view, similar to the roundabout and the lighting, when the Council decided to add the <br />third roundabout, the lighting also came with it. Rahn stated when the Council made the decision to go <br />from a 4 -foot wide median to a 10 -foot median, the minutes talked about a landscaped median. The <br />question for the Council now is whether it needs to be landscaped now or landscaped later with volunteers <br />perhaps but not have it part of the bidding process except for what is required for the roundabouts. <br />Printup noted his motion was only for the shrubs located in the roundabouts. Printup agreed that the <br />Council has gone over this a number of times but that he is more than happy to discuss it again. Printup <br />pointed out the road goes in front of the school and that when the landscaping would be blooming, school <br />will not be in session. Printup stated in his view for the most part this is a beautification project and that <br />for a large part of the time that school is in session it would be covered with snow and ice. Printup <br />indicated there are a number of issues that he has problems with and that he has been upfront about them. <br />Ralph Kempf commented that he was here on the floor listening to these conversations when Council <br />Member Rahn was not present. Kempf pointed out that one thing that was discussed was that the <br />• landscaping is functional and would help direct the pedestrians to the crosswalks. One of the things the <br />Council looked at previously was that if they do not have a vegetative screening to accomplish that, then <br />there was going to be a fence. The fence turned out to be actually more expensive than the vegetation <br />Page 11 of 24 <br />