My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
04-12-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 12:53:57 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 12:53:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. Funding Request for Milfoil Project, Continued) <br />Osgood stated Grays Bay is very shallow and was actually down two feet last year, but without the milfoil, they <br />were able to have wake boarders and water skiers on the bay, which has never occurred before. Osgood stated <br />that while there are concerns over the efficacy of the chemicals, he would feel comfortable recommending it. <br />Franchot asked if there is any indication that there will be an ending point for the treatment. <br />Osgood stated it is his expectation that there will be some need for ongoing management but that the level of <br />treatment will decrease going forward as the milfoil becomes eradicated. The treatment from last year on Gray's <br />Bay is down 70 percent due to the good level of control, and that the hope is to reach some type of maintenance <br />level. <br />Drazan stated she has found that the state of Washington has a great web site with a number of studies on the <br />impact to native plants. They found that after one to two years, there is a significant increase in native plants. <br />As it relates to retreatment, it is important to review the bays every year and there may be some minor treatment <br />that is required. Drazan commented that milfoil will grow if it is dropped in the lake and that some minor <br />ongoing treatment will have to be done. Drazan pointed out that the milfoil harvesting is actually increasing the <br />milfoil. The harvesting is an ongoing venture by the LMCD, is very expensive, does not decrease the milfoil, <br />and that the residents of Carman's Bay are looking at reduced amounts of chemicals that will be necessary in the <br />coming years. <br />Murphy asked what position the LMCD has taken on this. <br />McDermott stated LMCD supports the five year program for the three bays and the Save the Lake Fund will be <br />contributing some monies towards that project. <br />Murphy asked how much the LMCD is contributing. <br />McDermott indicated the LMCD is contributing $10,000 per bay and that that amount will be reduced once they <br />reach the point where only spot treatments are necessary. <br />Murphy asked where the DNR is on this treatment process. <br />Osgood stated the program is part of a Lake Vegetation Plan, which has been signed off by the DNR. <br />The DNR has also contributed $25,000 this year, which is to be split among the three bays. <br />Murphy asked if the Minnetonka Watershed District has taken a position on this. <br />Osgood indicated he is not aware that they have taken a position. Osgood noted this project is mainly under the <br />purview of the LMCD. <br />Murphy commented the City has had a significant amount of interaction with the Watershed District regarding <br />tributary issues and phosphorous in the past and that he was curious why they have remained silent on this issue. <br />• <br />is <br />Osgood indicated he cannot speak for them but that he is not aware of any concerns that they have regarding the • <br />project. <br />White stated generally the aquatic chemicals are fairly low toxicity but that they do not just kill milfoil. <br />Page 6 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.