My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
04-12-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 12:53:57 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 12:53:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. Funding Request for Milfoil Project, Continued) <br />available yet to achieve a perfect balance. The City has relied on the LMCD in this regard about what the City <br />should be doing. Bremer indicated she is not sure what the other alternatives are and that she would love to hear <br />from Mr. Osgood regarding what the true life of the treatment is and how the application really works. <br />Osgood stated there are two chemical herbicides that will be used on the three bays but that only one of them <br />will be used on Carman's Bay. The chemical will be applied one part per million, which is a very low dosage in <br />the water. The chemical degrades in the sunlight and has a half -life of nine to ten days depending on the water <br />temperature. The chemical will break down completely within a matter of weeks to months. <br />Osgood stated the main restriction is the watering restriction and applies to ornamental plants and vegetables, <br />such as tomatoes. According to the manufacturer's label, the length of the restriction is 120 days or when the <br />residual measured in the water is nondetectable. The applicator is charged with measuring that. Last year the <br />treatment was unfortunately later in the year and there was also a drought. <br />The chemicals are registered for use with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and are allowed for use. <br />Osgood noted he does manage weeds in his lawn on a spot treatment basis. Most people do not know very much <br />about milfoil and aquatic plants since they are under water, but the basic ecology is the same. <br />Drazan stated as it relates to the safety of the chemical, according to the EPA, no herbicide may be registered for <br />• aquatic use if it has more than one in one million chance of causing significant harmful effects on human health, <br />wild life or the environment. The lifetime risk of dying in a car is one in 83, dying by being struck by lightning <br />is 1 in 80,000, and dying by being struck by an asteroid is 1 in 200,000. People have more of a chance of being <br />hit by an asteroid than by being killed with this herbicide. <br />McMillan asked if the chemical is applied and things go perfectly, what they expect to happen. <br />Osgood stated if the treatment goes as expected, the results will resemble Grays Bay. Some native aquatic <br />species will increase and some native aquatic species will go down for a period of time. They cannot predict <br />exactly which species will go down but the hope is that there will be practically no milfoil left and the native <br />plants should survive. <br />McMillan stated the interesting and difficult thing about Lake Minnetonka is the number of different bays, which <br />have differing water levels and varying levels of phosphorous due to the dumping of sewage into the lake back <br />in the 1960s. Some of the bays in the lower lake have better water quality than the upper lake. Some of the <br />difficulty in trying to compare one bay to another is that they do differ, which will cause the treatment results to <br />vary. <br />Osgood stated the United States Army Corps of Engineers has advised the EPA on the use of these chemicals <br />and will be advising on this project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will also be doing the plant inventories <br />before treatment, during treatment, and after treatment. Osgood stated he feels comfortable saying that <br />Carman's Bay is comparable to Grays Bay and Phelps Bay and that a third party will be conducting the testing. <br />McMillan pointed out there are some concerns from last year's treatment, particularly on Grays Bay, because <br />• more of the native plants were killed than had been anticipated. Lake water is dynamic and constantly changing, <br />which makes treatment difficult. The water quality diminished slightly in Gray's Bay and there is no guarantee <br />the water quality will get better with the treatment. <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.