Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, �ovember 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS ; RALPH KEMPF, <br />Kempf commented a number of commercial developments nowadays are well developed architecturally <br />and that Orono, being a very rural area, might do well to incorporate a higher level of greenery and trees <br />in their commercial developments to help preserve the rural character of the comninunity. <br />Kempf stated he would be available for <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />5. #06 -3218 BRIAN ARNE AND JULIE MORRISON — ARNE, KERRY AND KIANN <br />NASSAUER,130 AND 145 MANOR CIRCLE — FINAL PLAT AND VACATION — <br />RESOLUI'ION NO. 5529 and 5530 <br />Brian Arne and Julie Morison, Applicants, were present. <br />Gaffron stated the applicants received preliminary plat approval for the vacation of Manor Circle and a <br />replat that incorporates portions of Manor Circle! into their individual properties. The applicants have <br />completed or have agreed to complete all subdivision ordinance requirements for platting, as well as the <br />requirements for final plat approval. <br />Gaffron stated this application came about because of a previous developer's failure to make the <br />necessary changes to convert this into a private roadway and City Staff not requiring that it be rectified <br />during the later Countryside plats. Gaffron stated the Council does have the option to provide some <br />financial relief to the applicants by waiving the Anal platting and legal review fees. <br />McMillan stated she requested this item be removed from the Consent°Agenda to allow for discussion of <br />the waiver of the platting and legal fees. <br />Julie Morison stated they have been working with Staff on this matter for a number of months now and <br />that during that process it was discovered that a road easement went through their property. Variances <br />would not have been required for this project except for the road easement. The reconunendation by Staff <br />was to vacate the road easement, and as they have gone through that process, the homeowner's <br />association has gotten involved and the parties have incurred a number of expenses in connection with <br />this matter. Morison requested they be given some financial reimbursement for the fees they have <br />incurred correcting a situation that should have been corrected by the previous developer. <br />Sansevere inquired whether the City is somehowlat fault for the failure of the developer to make this a <br />private roadway. <br />Gaffion stated in the agreement the City offered to the developer in 1985, the City did not require the <br />developer to replat the land at that time and that at the time the subdivision to the north of this lot was <br />• completed, it became clear that this road was not 'required and it should have been replatted at that time. <br />Gaffron stated the replatting was apparently forgotten but it does have some ramifications on this <br />property. <br />PAGE 3 of 15 <br />