Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(4. SALLYKOENECKE, LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, <br />Continued) <br />Minneapolis, who is in the process of implementing a new system that will be up and running by the fall <br />of 2007. <br />Sansevere inquired whether all of Orono would have Wi -Fi access or whether there would only be <br />selected areas that would have access. <br />Koenecke stated they are looking at areas where access is not reliable at the present time, which is one of <br />the reasons why the Commission elected to delay implementing this type of system. <br />Sansevere inquired what the cost would be to the residents. <br />Koenecke stated they conducted two seminars with city officials last year and at that time proposed to <br />undertake feasibility studies, but the LMCC elected not to proceed forward with the feasibility studies due <br />to lack of funding and the rapid changes that are occurring at the present time with this technology. <br />Sansevere commented if the high -speed internet access is going to cost a resident over $100 a month, it is <br />unlikely that many residents would elect to use it since there are other cheaper options available. <br />Koenecke stated the cost to each Chaska resident for this type of system is $16 a month. Koenecke stated <br />she is not aware of what the costs would be to Orono citizens until a feasibility study is completed and an <br />interest survey completed. 0 <br />McMillan expressed a concern that the Commission would be investing a significant amount of money <br />into a system that may become obsolete in a relatively short period of time due to the changing <br />technology. <br />Koenecke stated they are reviewing Minneapolis's system because the provider is paying for the <br />infrastructure rather than the City, which helps to reduce the costs significantly. Koenecke indicated <br />typically the providers recommend that a five -year upgrade be incorporated into the costs. Koenecke <br />stated the LMCC is attempting to get an overview of the systems that other cities are utilizing and the <br />associated costs. <br />Murphy inquired whether this would be a direct competitive venture against landline providers and the <br />cable business. <br />Koenecke stated the phone companies are attempting'to get legislation• passed that would eliminate <br />franchising. <br />Murphy concurred that the LMCC is right in waiting to determine the best way to proceed. <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br />r� <br />LJ <br />PAGE 2 of 15 <br />r <br />