Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(8. - #06 -3238 VOGUE ICF HOMES ON BEHALF OF N7LLIA.MAND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 <br />WALTERS PORT LANE, Continued) <br />White recommended darker natural colors be utilized, which help to reduce the appearance of massing. <br />McMillan stated she has a concern with the vaulted glass and that the deck should not be driving the <br />design of the addition. <br />t <br />Mrs. Dunkley stated the majority of the glass already exists and that they are adding very little glass with <br />the addition. Dunkley indicated they love this area and want to remain in the house. Dunkley pointed out <br />there is a public beach near their lot. <br />Vogstrom stated the house is not a straight house across the front and that it is somewhat V- shaped. <br />Vogstrom stated they would be in favor of going with different colors if that is the recommendation of the <br />Council. <br />Sansevere inquired how far the house is located from the lakeshore. <br />Gaffron stated it is approximately 35 feet. <br />McMillan asked whether the structural coverage is grandfathered ul at 16 percent. <br />Turner stated it is. <br />Gaffron stated limits on structural coverage were put in place to deal with massing on properties and that <br />the proximity of this house to the lake is an issue. <br />Turner stated the deck off the bedroom is high enough that it should be included as structural coverage. <br />Mrs. Dunkley stated that deck would be removed. <br />Vogstrom stated that should reduce the hardcover by approximately 100 square feet. <br />Sansevere stated the home is very close to the lake compared to the other homes on the lake. <br />Mrs. Dunkley stated they are located at the end of the lake. <br />Sansevere stated if the house were located further away from the lake, it would not have such a big impact <br />on the lake. Sansevere suggested this application go back to the Planning Commission since the <br />applicants did not comply with their recommendation. <br />Sansevere moved to send the application back to the Planning Commission. <br />Halu1 stated he was not in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting and that he would have made <br />the point at the meeting about the headroom that was required for the stairway. <br />n <br />• <br />Peterson seconded the motion. <br />McMillan inquired whether the applicants could meet the recommendation of the Planning Commission. • <br />PAGE 10 of 15 <br />