Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 24, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />4. #06 -3184 PAUL THOMAS HOMES, 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD — VARIANCE — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5488 <br />Paul Vogstrom, Paul Thomas Homes, was present. <br />White noted the hardcover number in the resolution is different than what was contained in Staff's report. <br />Gaffron stated the applicant has requested 3,830 square feet but the Council approved 30.6 percent, which <br />is 3,240 square feet. <br />Gaffron stated a letter was received from William Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road, suggesting that due to <br />the narrowness of the proposed driveway, the applicant should be allowed additional hardcover for the <br />driveway width due to safety concerns. Miller has also suggested that the city's vacant lot located across <br />the street be utilized for construction parking. Staff does not have a problem granting the additional <br />hardcover solely for the purpose of expanding the width of the driveway but has an issue regarding the <br />use of the city lot for parking due to concerns that following the construction of the residence the lot <br />would likely be used for parking by other residents and visitors to the neighborhood. <br />McMillan inquired whether some temporary signs could be erected designating parking. <br />Gaffron stated he would like the input of the police department on that issue. <br />t � 1 <br />0 <br />Vogstrom stated they could grade an area to provide some parking halfway down the driveway and erect <br />signs on one side of the street. Vogstrom suggested parking on one side of the road be allowed. <br />McMillan recommended the police department be notified of the parking situation. McMillan inquired • <br />whether this would be a blind driveway following construction. <br />Gaffron stated it would not be a blind driveway. <br />Vogstrom stated they could try to widen the north side of the driveway near the road for better visibility <br />and also lessen the slope of the driveway. <br />White noted the speed limit in that area is posted at 25 miles per hour and most people in the <br />neighborhood are aware of the driveway. <br />Sansevere inquired whether the current proposed driveway would put the public at risk of injury or death <br />if the additional hardcover is not allowed. <br />Gaffron stated in his opinion the public is not at risk but that the property owner could perhaps experience <br />difficulty maneuvering up the driveway at certain times'of the year. Gaffron stated the extra width on the <br />driveway would make it safer for the people using the driveway and that a 10 -foot driveway versus an 8- <br />foot driveway would add approximately three percent additional hardcover. <br />Peterson commented the width of the driveway has been at eight feet for a number of years. <br />Murphy inquired whether the City Engineer should review this. <br />U <br />PAGE 2 <br />