Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 10, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />10 <br />( #06 -3196 McNAUGHTON /IiAMM, CONTINUED) <br />Moen inquired whether the Council has seen the purchase agreement. <br />Mayor Peterson indicated the Council normally would not see a purchase agreement in a situation like <br />this. <br />Kevin Kokesh, 1399 Orono Lane, noted he appeared at the last council meeting and that he would like his <br />previous comments to be taken into consideration at tonight's meeting. Kokesh stated he has a concern <br />regarding the buffer and the trees. <br />Barry Cavalanski, 1399 Orono Lane, inquired whether a delineated survey has been completed and <br />inquired whether the feasibility of building on this lot has been considered. <br />Gaffron stated a certificate of survey has been provided to the City and the applicant has also provided <br />today a proposed landscaping plan depicting berms. Gaffron stated as part of this subdivision application, <br />Staff typically does not get into the fine details of a development until later in the process. Gaffron stated <br />the proposed driveway does meet the standards of the City, but noted that the average setback issues have <br />not been resolved. <br />Gaffron illustrated the proposed location of the house and the average setback. Gaffron noted this <br />property was assessed and provided with a sewer stub back in the 1980s. • <br />White pointed out no structure is allowed within the 0 -75' setback. <br />Murphy noted he did speak with Mr. Callahan following the previous council meeting and that Mr. <br />Callahan reminded him that there is a contractual agreement regarding the special lot line rearrangement <br />between the City and the Goettens. Murphy inquired whether the City is able to pass a resolution <br />extinguishing that agreement. <br />Brokl stated the City could legally extinguish the agreement. <br />Murphy inquired exactly what variances are included in the application before the Council. <br />Gaffron stated as part of the approval process, the City would be granting variances that would allow <br />construction to lot area only. Gaffron stated the property owners would need to meet the side, street, and <br />rear setbacks as well as the average lakeshore setback. <br />Gaffron illustrated the location of the old lot line and the lot line being requested with this application. <br />Gaffron stated no variances have been requested to make the lot buildable other than lot area. <br />Murphy inquired whether the applicant understands exactly what is being requested tonight. <br />McNaughton indicated he understands. <br />PAGE 4 <br />• <br />