Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 10, 2006 <br />7:00, o'clock p.m. <br />( #06 -3196 McNAUGHTON /HA.MM, <br />Korstad stated the request is to allow for an improved ability to build on the 1401 Shoreline lot and to <br />eliminate the flag lot configuration of the 1391 Fox Street property. Korstad indicated the 1401 <br />Shoreline property has a number of issues due to its location on a corner of County Road 15, which <br />makes access difficult, and the large number of mature trees that exist. <br />Korstad stated the flag log configuration for Fox Street creates a useability issue because it is separated <br />from Outlot 1 by a regional rail right -of -way, County Road 15, and Orono Lane, which makes it difficult <br />to access the property other than by a vehicle. Korstad stated the lot is relatively small, which makes it <br />difficult to create an access to the lake, and that combination of these two lots would eliminate those <br />issues and would create a better lot to provide for an improved buffer to County Road 15 and would result <br />in one single family home at 1391 Fox Street ana one single family home at 1401 Shoreline Drive. The <br />Fox Street lot would be slightly less than two acres and the lot on Shoreline would be slightly less than <br />two acres but would be an increase from what it currently is. <br />Korstad stated if approval is not granted, there would be two homes with no lake access and the home at <br />1401 Shoreline Drive would have additional difficulty in providing a buffer to County Road 15, which <br />would place the property in a worse situation than if it were approved. Korstad requested the Council <br />approve the applicants' request so they can movc forward with their plans to construct on the lot. <br />• Edward Callahan, Orono, on behalf of Mrs. Goetten, stated Mrs. Goetten is opposed to the application, <br />noting that this situation is governed by a special lot line rearrangement agreement and the Council should <br />consider whether this proposed action would be in violation of that agreement. Callahan cautioned the <br />Council against passing a resolution, which in effect would nullify the previous agreement entered into by <br />the City. <br />Callahan stated in his opinion the location of the proposed driveway is in a dangerous spot and would not <br />lead to the safety of the citizens of Orono. Callahan stated if the hardship relates to the safety factor, the <br />Council should first determine whether it truly isl a safety factor. <br />Craig Moen, 1387 Orono Lane, inquired <br />Mr. Hamm. <br />McNaughton indicated he is appearing on <br />Moen stated in his opinion there should be a <br />City Attorney Brokl noted this is a joint <br />another. <br />Moen inquired whether there is a purchase <br />Mr. Hamm. <br />• Korstad indicated there is a purchase agreement. <br />there is a representative appearing tonight on behalf of <br />of Mr. Hamm. <br />person representing the other applicant. <br />and that the applicants are able to speak for one <br />that has been signed between Mr. McNaughton and <br />AGE 3 <br />