Laserfiche WebLink
N <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />• Monday, April 24, 2006 <br />7:00 o'Iclock p.m. <br />(6. #05 -3136 TROYBROITZMAN, 1860 S ORELINE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Sansevere asked how often the City allows an applicant to place plantings on a neighbor's property <br />in an effort to offset his removals. <br />Gaffron stated that it is extremely rare or an unusual exception to use adjoining property owners' <br />lots to plant a buffer. <br />Broitzman stated that the house's footprint is 4764 without the 1,000 s.f. veranda, with a main floor <br />of 3285 and 2 "d floor of 4072 s.f. <br />Mayor Peterson reiterated by asking how the applicant could take care of a drainage swale when <br />the property is entirely built out. <br />Although he needed additional information and 'to visit the site, Kellogg suggested that the swale <br />could be pulled onto the subject's property by possibly lowering the garage elevation a little bit to <br />get some grading done within the applicant's property. <br />McMillan pointed out that the existing spruce tr es would likely be lost if the swale collected water <br />in this area. <br />Kellogg concurred, stating that any grade change adjacent to those trees would be a concern. <br />Although he had not seen precisely where the trees were situated with regard to the proposed <br />driveway and grading, Kellogg suggested that al crest in the driveway as an additional way of <br />controlling the water and directing it away from this area with supplemental plantings might be a <br />possibility. <br />Blake Bichanich, of Blake and Associates Architects, stated that they were working with the <br />neighbors to come up with a mutually agreeable landscaping plan. <br />Sansevere asked why-they had not met with a <br />couple of weeks. <br />Broitzman indicated that he had met with a <br />concept plan by Friday. <br />architect to develop a plan over the past <br />architect that day and would likely have a <br />Mayor Peterson, once again, stated that she had "strong feelings about knowing what screening <br />there would be, including types, kinds, sizes, etc. She found it unfair of the applicant to suggest that <br />he would put screening on neighbor's properties to offset what he has created and was concerned <br />about the impacts of a swale near the lot line. <br />White questioned using the driveway as a sort of swale with an inverted crown directing water to <br />pool along the property line and causes the existing vegetation to have wet feet. <br />Although he believed Mr. Broitzman had made any improvements since the last meeting, <br />• Murphy maintained that if the footprint and size I of the proposed residence was smaller the City, or <br />neighbors, would not be faced with these issues. He believed that a house of this magnitude would <br />be setting a new precedent or standard of scale in this neighborhood. He saw, not only the driveway <br />PAGE 3 of 10 <br />