Laserfiche WebLink
44 <br />• <br />11 <br />(5. <br />MINiJTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 10, 2006 <br />7:00'o'clock p.m. <br />#06 -3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 <br />Gaffron stated the neighbors' decks do extend is <br />ordinances is to require everyone to build outsi( <br />improvements to their lot - Gaffron noted the R <br />keep that wherever possible. Gaffron noted pro <br />would need to be found to encroach further into <br />setback is more important than the average lake <br />Murphy inquired how old the other two houses <br />A neighbor in the audience indicated the houses <br />UR PARK DRIVE, Continued) <br />the 0 -75' setback but that the objective of the <br />of the 0 -75' setback when they wish to rebuild or make <br />Z has a 50 -foot setback and that the City attempts to- - <br />,sal one is at approximately 42 feet and that a hardship <br />at setback. Gaffron stated in his opinion the DNR <br />ore setback. <br />approximately 30 years old. <br />Gaffron stated a 75 -foot setback would not allow'a buildable lot <br />Sansevere inquired whether this would be precedent setting if the deck were allowed to encroach into the <br />0 -75' setback. Sansevere stated he would like to be consistent with what the council has allowed in the <br />past. <br />Mikkelson stated he has a number of addresses along the lakeshore that have recently been granted more <br />hardcover than what he is proposing. <br />Sansevere stated the Council has to do what is <br />Jurgens inquired whether there is a prow that <br />Mikkelson stated the prow creates less hardcover <br />Gaffron indicated it extends approximately four <br />and be consistent. <br />forward from the deck. <br />over the average lakeshore setback line. <br />Jurgens stated the extension of the roofline should be taken into consideration. Jurgens stated the reason <br />for his dissention on the vote was that he felt the hardcover could be reduced further. <br />Murphy inquired whether the prow is an <br />Gaffron stated the prow is an extension of the <br />Mikkelson stated his builder told him the <br />Murphy stated the overhang would make the <br />seven feet forward. <br />- Sansevere inquired whether the neighbor has a <br />The neighbor indicated he does not. <br />ioii of the roof or the house.. <br />�se and extends approximately another four feet. <br />was a foot and a half around the house. <br />look a lot closer to the lake if the home is moved <br />with his view =given the prow. <br />Gaffron stated the plan that was approved by the Planning Commission has a 45 -foot setback. Gaffron <br />indicated staff would prefer a plan that would be closer to the 50 -foot setback. <br />PAGE 5 of 15 <br />