Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 10, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(5. #06 -3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 BALDUR PARK DRIVE, Continued) <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new single - family residence. <br />The variances consist of lot area and lot width variances for a lot 0.19 acre in area and 51' -55' in width <br />---= - - - where 100' is normally required and 0 -75' hardcover variance to allow 987 square-feet-or-24-39-percent - <br />hardcover where 0 percent is normally allowed and 75 -250' hardcover variance to allow 1,494 square <br />feet or 36.16 percent hardcover where 25 percent is normally allowed. A conditional use permit is also <br />required in order to conduct land alterations below the 931.5' 100 -year floodplain elevation. <br />The applicant has submitted a revised plan at the request of the Planning Commission and has also <br />submitted an alternate plan based on discussions with the neighbor to the south. The alternate plan shows <br />the home shifted seven feet closer to the lake in order to put the home in line with each of the neighboring <br />homes and the deck in line with the neighboring decks. <br />The Planning Commission voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the variances as requested provided the <br />applicant reduces the street side deck to 35 square feet. The dissenting Commissioner felt that further <br />hardcover reductions could be made. <br />Planning Staff does not recommend that the alternate plan be approved as the result would be a further <br />encroachment toward the lake. Staff recommends approval of the variances consistent with the.Planning <br />Commission's recommendation. <br />Mikkelson stated he has taken steps over the years to protect the water quality of the lake and that he is • <br />proposing a smaller sized house to help minimize the runoff. Mikkelson stated he has reduced the <br />hardcover on the lot wherever possible. <br />Mikkelson stated he would like the house moved closer to the lake to gain more privacy from his <br />neighbors, noting that presently they are able to look directly into his bedroom. Mikkelson requested the <br />Council approve the alternate plan. <br />Sansevere questioned whether the neighbors could truly see into the applicant's residence from their <br />decks. Sansevere suggested the applicant consider purchasing drapes for his windows. <br />Murphy stated it appears from the plans that if the house is moved seven feet forward, the neighbors <br />would be able to look inside the applicant's house easier. <br />Mikkelson demonstrated the line of sight from the neighbors' residences. Mikkelson stated his neighbors <br />sit on their decks regularly. <br />White stated the Council would prefer to have the deck outside of the 0 -75' setback and that the house is <br />not the problem. White noted the lot is a small lot and would require lot area and lot width variances in <br />order to construct a house. <br />Murphy stated he is not opposed to the seven feet and that the view from the lake would be better if the <br />houses were all lined up. Murphy noted the proposed deck is smaller than the other two neighbors. <br />McMillan inquired whether the neighbors' decks are located into the 0 -75' setback somewhat. 40 <br />PAGE 4 of 15 <br />