03-13-2006 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • • MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, March 13, 2006 7:00 o'clock p.m. (4. #05 -3136 TROYBROITZMAN, 1860SHORELINEDRIVE, Continued) Gaffron suggested the Council look at Photo C -2, the houses are generally at an angle with the shore generally that means the houses are looking over Murphy inquired whether the house should be set Coward stated if the assumption is that the propos but they might have a different reaction if the foot Murphy stated on paper this footprint meets all of the footprint that is built. Charrier stated locating the house further back resi which would make it more visible in his view. White inquired whether there is a more recent Gaffron stated the plan in Council's packets is proposing a number of tall evergreen trees McMillan inquired why screening is only being Broitzman stated there is already screening on the as much screening as possible on the other side an, at the rear of the property because that is where he located. Broitzman stated he does not want to rem like to protect the remaining trees on the property 1 White inquired how wide the driveway is. rich would help to illustrate the area. Gaffron stated e and not square to the shoreline. Gaffron stated neighbor's lawn out to the lake. further than 15 feet. footprint stays, they would have the same reaction, nt changes. City's standards and that he is assuming that will be in the house ending up on the backside of the lot, plan. t is the current plan submitted by the applicant, which the property line. for one side. ne side and that he has committed all along to provide in the rear. Broitzman noted he did remove the trees iriginally thought the driveway was going to be ve any more trees than necessary and that he would ✓ possibly adjusting the grading. Broitzman stated the driveway is proposed to be 16 feet wide. Coward indicated he was not aware of the width of the driveway and inquired whether that is half the width of County Road 15. Kellogg stated typically the width would be 12 feet; for a driving lane. White stated in his opinion the driveway does not the driveway may help to preserve some trees. Coward commented that perhaps the applicant is to be 16 feet wide and that reducing the width of a two -way driveway. Sansevere inquired how many trees would be lost in the controlled burn. Broitzman stated he was planning to remove the Broitzman stated Charrier did express a concern trees down by the bottom of the driveway. t the removal of those four trees but that they were PAGE 13 of 27