My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
03-13-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:26:56 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:26:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. #05 -3136 TROYBROITZMAN,1860 SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Broitzman stated there is a maple tree that is lined up with the front of the proposed house and that there <br />are pine trees on both sides of the property. Broitzman stated the house is sitting about even with the <br />maple tree between the two houses. <br />McMillan commented that trees come and go but buildings stay. McMillan stated the reason the house <br />came forward was to protect some of the trees in the back. <br />Broitzman stated it was also his understanding after speaking with Mr. Gaffron that the primary purpose <br />of the average lakeshore setback is to protect the views of the neighbors from the front of the property and <br />that the side views are not necessarily protected by the average lakeshore setback. <br />McMillan stated the average lakeshore setback lines are drawn from the houses directly next to this <br />property and that the line would not normally be drawn from the Nelson's property. McMillan stated she . <br />would like to see the line located 10 to 15 feet further back from that line. <br />Gaffron stated the Cowards are technically the next adjacent lakeshore lot. Gaffron stated the new line <br />was reached at the previous council meeting. <br />Murphy inquired where the 15 -foot line is located on the overhead. <br />Gaffron illustrated the 15 -foot line. <br />Sansevere inquired whether the applicant would like to have his view of the lake from the side blocked. <br />Broitzman stated the entire back portion of Charrier's house is a garage, so the portion closest to the lake <br />has minimal windows, with the road curving, and so there really is not much of a lake view from his deck <br />off to the side but to the front. <br />Charrier indicated that he does have a view from certain rooms of his residence of Mr. Broitzman's house <br />and that they have tried to find the best placement for the house which would have the least impact. <br />Sansevere indicated he agrees with Council Member McMillan and that the adjoining neighbor has a right <br />not to have to look at the side of his house. <br />Greg Coward, 1950 Heritage Drive, stated when the original proposal came forward, they were looking at <br />19,000 square feet, which consisted of 3000 square feet of garage. Coward noted a six to seven foot high <br />retaining wall was also proposed and that he had concerns about a car going off the edge and over the <br />retaining wall. Coward indicated he is in agreement with Charrier in the proposed location of the house. <br />Sansevere inquired whether Mr. Coward is okay with the 15 feet. <br />Coward stated in his view the 15 -foot line is more of a concern for the Charriers rather than himself and <br />so he would go along with what the, Charriers desire. <br />Murphy inquired whether there would be any advantage to locating the house further back than 15 feet. <br />Murphy stated the house does not sit square with the curvature of Shoreline Drive. . <br />PAGE 12 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.