Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 27, 2006 • <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(7. #06 -3173 CITY OF ORONO IND MISTRIAL DISTRICT ZONING STANDARDS <br />ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, Continued) <br />Mayor Peterson moved, Murphy seconded, to table the City of Orono — Zoning Code <br />Amendment, Industrial District Standards for further discussion. VOTE: Ayes 5; Nays 0. <br />*8. #06 -3175 JAMES AND JUDITH PEIRPONT, 1801 WEST FARM ROAD — <br />RENEWAL LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 5431 <br />White moved, Sansevere seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5431, a Resolution <br />Approving a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement for Properties Located at 1801 and <br />1849 West Farm Road — File #06 -3175. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />9. #06 -3178 CITY OF ORONO, NONCONFORMING USES — ZONING CODE <br />AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE NO. 33,3 RD SERIES <br />Gaffron explained that, in order to be consistent with State Statute revisions passed in 2004, the <br />proposed code amendment results in specific changes in the way the City does business regarding <br />rebuilds and expanding nonconforming residential structures. He continued,. noting that with regard <br />to residential rebuilds where there are pre- existing nonconformances, the Planning Commission has <br />attempted to establish threshold levels of structural removals or expansion that would trigger the <br />entire new construction having to meet code. Gaffron cited specific changes on page 3, #3 of <br />Nonconforming Structures subsections 1 -3, to further detail the limits to expansion of <br />nonconforming structures. <br />McMillan moved, White seconded, adopting Ordinance No. 33, 3rd Series, Amending Chapter <br />78 of the Orono Municipal Code by Amending Section 78 -71 Regarding Nonconforming Uses <br />and Structures. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />10. 1331 NORTH ARM DRIVE — REVIEW CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. <br />4026 <br />Gaffron reported that the property owners have requested that existing heating and plumbing <br />fixtures in an accessory building be approved for continued use, requiring a revision of Resolution <br />No. 4026 adopted January 26, 1998. While the original approval resolution required the removal <br />of plumbing and heating facilities prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, today's <br />codes allow plumbing in accessory structures and do not address the issue of heating accessory <br />structures. Gaffron stated that staff has recommended an amendment to the language of the <br />original Resolution No. 4026 to allow plumbing for a sink and to allow heating facilities for the <br />accessory building, but would request the`bathroom fixtures be disconnected and removed from the <br />building. <br />Gail Wilder and Peter Beck, representatives of the owner, requested that the residents be allowed to <br />disconnect without completely removing the tub and shower, since this would require a great deal <br />of demolition. Instead, Beck suggested that the applicants build a bookshelf unit over the <br />tub /shower to obscure their presence. <br />PAGE 6 of 9 <br />