02-27-2006 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO CITY C • Monday, Fe 7:00 o' • (7. #06 -3173 CITY OF ORONO INDIISS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, Continued) listed as an accessory or permitted use. He City Council. White mentioned that, as he drove around the p; park he encountered had some sort of limited re the City of Orono was afraid of by not allowing wish to see the City zone this out entirely. McMillan concurred, pointing out that sales retail should be allowed. Grittman stated that, oftentimes, limited sales as many communities that might not wish to see in with it. Murphy cautioned the Council to be thoughtful consequences. McMillan suggested the Council spend more ti: OF THE �IL MEETING 27, 2006 p.m. DISTRICT ZONING STANDARDS that the allowances are at the discretion of the week he observed that most every industrial . associated with it. He questioned what it was V retail within the zone and stated that he did not to showroom or something less than regular .ed with a showroom business is allowed in retail sales and the parking issues associated regard to retail and its unintended looking into this. Johnson asked for more information with regard I to the potential access to the south end of Morrie's property. He suggested consideration be given to the partial use of the MnDOT ROW. Murphy stated that he had attended a recent turnback meeting at which he urged the engineer's to begin the address or draw up something as it relates to this case. Gen McJilton, Ryan Properties, asked for further clarification of the 25% rule on page 3, that additions be made to the building materials sect'i'on, and that signage language be spelled out as it pertains to buildings with 2 ROW's with consideration given to proposed language from another city. I Grittman stated that the 25% rule is tied to the b building materials and signage issues have been building fagade faces two or more ROW's, they , and it is the City's opinion that the sed. As written, he pointed out that if a need to meet the 5% on those sides. White maintained that the City must continue to' :push the road issues forward as soon as possible, so that the business owners understand the impacts on their proposals. Murphy commented that he would not support of those residents living south of the new High Gaffron pointed out that, currently, inside lit add this as a condition. lit signs or security lights within the sightlines 12 at night. are not prohibited, and suggested the Council PAGE 5 of 9