My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
01-23-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:25:14 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:25:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,:1 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITYC COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 23, 2006 <br />• 7:00 0 'clock p.m. <br />U <br />(9. #06 -3173 CITY OF ORONO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ZONING STANDARDS <br />ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, Continued) <br />Brixius stated that the City should delineate at which point additions make the applicants subject to <br />mandatory conformance. He encouraged each! party to assemble and submit their comments in <br />writing for further discussion and incorporation. <br />Johnson pointed out that the rear 13 acres behind Morrie's may be subject to development <br />sometime in the future. If they knew how the access to the southern portion was to be laid out, <br />other questions regarding this ordinance may arise, as they might then be concerned about frontage <br />road at a later date. <br />With regard to the tinting of this ordinance revision, since the city is expecting an application from <br />Ryan, Gaffron stated that the City contracted with the consultants to work toward a resolution. <br />While NAC has been turning things around rather quickly, Gaffron suggested the Council hold a <br />work session before its next scheduled City Council meeting to discuss these questions before <br />moving forward. <br />White concurred, pointing out that this is Orono 's only industrial area and they need to look at the <br />access issue, as well as, several other elements'at a work session. <br />Murphy reiterated that it would be the city's inl ent to `grandfather' existing tenants and conditional <br />use permits. He commended Morrie's for the substantial progress they've made on their site; <br />however, he pointed out that this ordinance provides the City with its only leverage when <br />ownership changes hands. If the City wishes things to be done differently, when ownership <br />changes occur, this is the time to do so. He pointed out that as part of the highway 12 turnback <br />project, they've been looking at access plans but the City has not yet received direction from the <br />County. <br />Sansevere asked Attorney Brokl how much lati <br />Brokl stated that the question with regard to `gr <br />do the changes trigger other issues. While an al <br />conformancy, if they choose to add onto the bu <br />compliant. <br />MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT <br />Sansevere stated that he was unaware that both <br />asked the newspaper representative if he repres <br />link to the City's legal notices on the website. <br />`grandfathering' allows current permit holders. <br />thering non - conformances' in is at what point <br />.it cannot necessarily `expand' the non- <br />, the new portion of the structure should be <br />papers were owned by the same company. He <br />both papers and whether they could provide a <br />Though he, too, was unaware of this previously,! the newspaper representative stated that he did, in <br />essence, represent both papers and would check.into providing a link. <br />Moorse pointed out that the Pioneer had no plan' to have the same readership or look as the Sun <br />Sailor. <br />PAGE 9 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.