Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 23, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />7. #05 -3152 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT ON BEHALF OF JAMES D. MACKINNON <br />ET AL, `3500' WATERTOWN ROAD — PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL — DRAFT <br />RESOLUTION <br />Gaffron stated that since the December 12 meeting, the applicant has provided the City with <br />concept sketches regarding the location, orientation and grading impacts for a proposed home on <br />lot 3, block 2, and met with staff, City consultants, his own consultants and the MCWD to discuss <br />the issues of placement of the storm water pond within the designated wetland area. Gaffron <br />pointed out that he is in receipt, just today, of a revised storm water pond location which locates the <br />pond outside of the wetland area and does not adversely impact the trees etc. While it appears that <br />the new location addresses many issues, Gaffron stated that he had not spoken to the adjoining <br />neighbor. Also, while the applicant believes the location will meet wetland requirements, they need <br />to get an official weigh -in by the MCWD to see if they accept the new plans. And finally, Gaffron <br />stated that although some lots are slightly less than 2 acres he would like direction to bring back a <br />resolution for approval at the next meeting as he would not recommend approval of the draft <br />tonight as revisions have been made. <br />Bohland stated that he felt extremely comfortable that this new proposal will work, thanks to <br />everyone's efforts achieved at a meeting late last week. Although he recognized that some items <br />needed to be reviewed, Bohland asked whether the Council could approve the application subject <br />to those approvals, if they felt comfortable in doing so. <br />• <br />Murphy stated that he would not support bringing in fill to create a flat backyard for these homes, • <br />since at times, homeowners try to create a yard where there isn't an opportunity to do so. <br />Bohland stated that they could put in place additional covenants to that means. He added that the <br />NURP pond would act as more of a shallow wetland area. <br />Though he had not been given time to review the revisions, Engineer Kellogg stated that the NURP <br />pond would be designed to follow contours to promote natural vegetation. <br />Maureen Bellows, a neighbor to the development, pointed out that 1.7 feet between the normal and <br />high water seemed somewhat conservative and questioned how this would affect their alternate <br />septic site. In addition, they expressed concern that the NURP pond might end up spilling over onto <br />the northwest corner of their property as there was little margin between normal and reality. <br />Kellogg stated that, at first brush, he will need to look at additional drawings and calculations from <br />their yard as well as the one provided by Bohland and identify an outlet structure. <br />Bellows stated that, though she did not have an overall objection to the location of the pond, the <br />water typically runs east to west and overflows into their yard. She encouraged the City to take a <br />careful look at the calculations before they proceed. <br />Sansevere asked staff whether they were comfortable granting conditional support at this time. <br />Gaffron stated that the City Engineer needs to be allowed adequate review of the proposal before <br />the Council grants approval, though if comfortable, the Council could grant conditional approvals • <br />despite the fact that MCWD approvals are necessary as well. <br />PAGE 6 of 12 <br />