My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
01-23-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:25:14 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:25:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�7 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 23, 2006 <br />• 7:00, clock p.m. <br />LJ <br />(6. #05 -3131 STEVEBOHLAND OF <br />DR1* TIE NORTH AND 177 GLENDALE E <br />Bohland stated that they were bringing in or <br />the illustration depicts a 60% walkout level. <br />VD DEVELOPMENT, INC. 190 IVILL0W <br />Continued) <br />enough to allow for walkouts, which as shown on <br />Gaffron stated that depending upon whether the Council allows a 15% structural cover limitation or <br />a floor /ratio equation which allows for more flexibility or restrictiveness, a balance must be struck. <br />Bohland stated that he is committed to building a rambler style home for lot B which may look <br />slightly different than the depiction but will have a nice look with lots of landscaping. <br />Murphy stated that, while he appreciated Bohland's efforts to provide a combination of <br />landscaping, list of covenants, and a connnitrnent to the back side detail which will be a vast <br />improvement to the current Willow views, he wished he had a front view illustration as well. He <br />continued to worry how this parcel will look in comparison to the surrounding neighborhoods, <br />though he aclaiowledged that whatever is proposed for this parcel will be vastly different than <br />views near it currently. <br />Sansevere pointed out that, similar to the lake side lots, bigger homes are being proposed inland as <br />well. <br />Bohland stated that it was their opinion that this would be an improvement, or an upgrade, cleaning <br />up the site and committing to meeting more restrictive guidelines. <br />White suggested that, at the proposed price tag Iof $700 - 900,000 per home, the installation of fire <br />suppression systems at a mere $5,000 cost would be a wise investment as would attention to energy <br />efficiency. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that, initially, the devel <br />indicated that she still had an issue with the in <br />they had done, Mayor Peterson stated that she <br />proposed for this site. <br />Gaffron stated that if massing is' an issue the C4 <br />adjust it accordingly. <br />not was proposed at 2 -3 homes per acre. She <br />g in this neighborhood. While she liked what <br />hoping to see more moderate priced homes <br />should look at the FAR, floor area ratio, and <br />Sansevere stated that he did not have a probleni with the massing here, as they are virtually <br />creating an individual neighborhood here, with Isimilarly sized homes. <br />Murphy stated that he believed Bohland had <br />meet our conservation goals. <br />Bohland stated that he would look forward to <br />No formal motion. <br />all that he could to cooperate with the City and <br />PAGE 5 of 12 <br />the Council on a site visit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.