My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:52:21 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 3:48:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF TBE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 12, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(5. CHARLIE JAMES, 425 OLD CRYSTAL!BAYROAD NORTH, Continued) <br />the topsoil stripping on the rest of the parcel would, occur in February. The applicant is proposing to haul <br />in 25,000 cubic yards excavated from the area south of the cemetery in Long Lake to enable a key <br />element of the Highway 12.project to remain on schedule. <br />Gaffron stated in order to -properly handle a large volume of stonnwater drainage coming from Orono's <br />industrial'area and the StoneBay development, a large pond is being constructed just east of the Morrie's <br />site. This pond is planned to outlet into a storm sewer line that takes the stormwater to the east through a <br />series of ponds and into Long Lake. The storm sewer line was initially planned to go through the St. <br />George's Cemetery property. However, both Ames and Mn/DOT have been taking measures to avoid <br />disruption to the cemetery site. It was determined by all parties that disruption of the cemetery site for the <br />installation of the storm sewer line should be avoided if possible. The only other location for the storm <br />sewer line is behind the retaining wall that runs along the south edge of the cemetery property. <br />Gaffron indicated the storm sewer line cannot be installed until the retaining wall is constructed. In order <br />to install the storm sewer line behind the retaining wall, the timeline for construction of the retaining wall <br />has been moved up substantially and requires disposal of 25,000 cubic yards of dirt. Gaffron indicated <br />this was a new occurrence that arose which needs to be dealt with fairly quickly. Because the need to <br />dispose of this material was not anticipated prior to the recent decision regarding the location of the storm <br />sewer line, Ames Construction does not have a site for the disposal of the material. <br />Gaffron stated the interim plan has been revised toIenable the material excavated for the retaining wall to <br />be placed on the James site. This will not require any trucking on public roads. Staff has worked with the <br />applicant to limit the land alteration to the southern portion of the site and to ensure the fill is placed on <br />the site in conformance with the parameters determined by the Council. Gaffron noted other than a berm <br />along the edge of the property, the fill will not be above the elevation of Old Crystal Bay Road, with the <br />berming around the perimeter of the property being a key element to provide some screening and corridor <br />closure. I <br />Gaffron stated the grading plan has not been revised to reflect the discussions of the Council held on <br />November 28`x', but is contained in the plan submitted on Friday. Limiting the topsoil removal and filling <br />to the south end also avoids drainage impacts to adjacent properties to the north and west, which was the <br />key concern expressed by the adjoining property owners. <br />Gaffron stated subject to the recommendations of <br />agencies, which includes the Watershed District a <br />supportive of the request for an interim permit to ; <br />property and to fill and grade that portion of the p' <br />City Engineer and necessary permits from other <br />the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Staff is <br />p topsoil from the southern portion of the James <br />erty. <br />Gaffron noted he has spoken with the surrounding property owners about the drainage issues both <br />short-terns and long -terns and has also discussed this proposal with the Dumases, who also indicated some <br />concerns regarding drainage. <br />Gaffion requested the Council consider authorizing staff to issue an interim land alteration permit for <br />topsoil stripping and filling in the southern portionof the James property subject to the City Engineer's <br />review and the necessary permits from other agencies. <br />White inquired how high the soil would be at the highest point. <br />PAGE 3 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.