My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
09-12-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:51:23 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:56:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. #05 -3143 DANHESSBURG OFHESSBURG DEVELOPMENT, INC., 774 TONKAWA ROAD, <br />Continued) <br />McMillan moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5377, a Resolution <br />granting lot area, lot width and hardcover variances for Dan Hessburg of Hessburg <br />Development, Inc., 774 Tonkawa Road, subject to review and approval of the grading and <br />drainage plan by the City Engineer. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />5. APPEAL —1535 BOHN'S POINT ROAD — GATE HEIGHT AND SIGNAGE <br />INTERPRETATION <br />David Sonka, Bever Landscaping, was present. <br />City Attorney Barrett indicated he has spoken with Staff regarding this appeal. Barrett stated with respect <br />to the gate height, there is some ambiguity in the City ordinances and Staff is unclear whether it should be <br />treated as a fence or not. Barrett stated the City Council should determine the policy on gate height, <br />which would enable Staff to interpret the ordinance. <br />Barrett stated the second issue before the Council relates to the signage interpretation and that in his <br />opinion the ordinance does not allow estate names and it does not need to be heard on tonight's appeal. <br />Murphy expressed a concern that a city policy be decided tonight as part of this appeal. <br />Barrett stated the City Council does have the right to table the application in order to further review what <br />the city's policy on this issue should be. <br />Murphy stated it is difficult to make a decision on one application that would affect other property owners <br />in the City. <br />White concurred with Murphy that it is difficult to make a decision tonight on an item that would affect a <br />number of other residents. White noted other cities have allowed estate names on gates and over gates. <br />Brad Roehl, Long Lake Fire Chief, indicated he does have a concern with the width of the gate and the <br />direction that the gate faces the road. Roehl indicated there are some properties in the community that <br />have gates that make it difficult for emergency vehicles to access the property. <br />White inquired whether Staff is able to determine how the gate is oriented to the road. <br />Gundlach indicated the location of the gate is not depicted on the survey submitted to the City. Gundlach <br />stated the monument ordinance requires a five -foot setback and that the gate complies with that <br />requirement. <br />White inquired what happens if the gate is locked and the fire department needs to access the property. • <br />PAGE 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.