09-12-2005 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�p MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, September 12, 2005 7:00 o'clock p.m. (3. #05 -3141 JEFFREYAND ETHEL GUSTAFSG White stated he is not opposed to this application but the City Engineer. Gustafson stated they do have a good working relatic professional staff to do their surveying and grading v Murphy indicated he also is willing to approve it sub Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RE; area variance and conditional use permit for J subject to the review and approval of the City VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 4. #05 -3143 DAN HESSBURG OF HESSBUI ROAD — VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 5377 Dan Hessburg, Applicant, was present. N, 4203 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) t he would like it to be reviewed and approved by with the City and that they do hire to approval by the City Engineer. PION NO. 5376, a Resolution granting a lot and Ethel Gustafson, 4203 North Shore Drive, per of the grading and drainage plan. DEVELOPMENT, INC., 774 TONKAWA Gundlach stated the applicant is requesting a lot area'variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot .36 acres in area where 1.0 acres is normally required; a lot width variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot 74 feet in width at the shoreline and 61 feet in width at is the 75 foot setback where 140 feet is normally required; a hardcover variance to permit 29.8 percent hardcover within the 75' -250' zone where 25 percent is normally allowed and 27.2 percent currently exists; and a hardcover variance to permit 39.4 percent hardcover within the 250 -500' zone where 30 percent is normally allowed and 66.8 percent currently exists. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing residence and construct a new home within the required setbacks. • The Planning Commission did review this applicati approval of the lot area and lot width variances but zone be reduced to 27.2 percent. In addition, the P turnaround apron be put back into the 75' -250' zon the turnaround since this property abuts a county r( Gundlach stated the applicant did submit a revised g Engineer's comments. Gundlach noted there is a sn apron to avoid runoff onto the neighboring property Hessburg stated the drainage was based on the e). Engineer to resolve any drainage issues that may Murphy stated he would like it noted that the 27.2 p the circumstances. at their August meeting and recommended commended that the hardcover within the 75' -250' ping Commission recommended that the 8' by 8' Gundlach noted the City's code technically requires ing plan, which meets the majority of the City issue regarding the grading of the turnaround g grade and that he is willing to work with the City remain. PAGE 3 II hardcover appears appropriate for this lot under