Laserfiche WebLink
co <br />• <br />I <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 25, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(10. #05 -3133 BRUCE AND ELIZABETH IV USBA UM, 3480 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, <br />Continued) I <br />While the garage sits 3.5' off the side yard, Nusbaum noted that any more than 5' would obstruct <br />the view from the house. A plan which was designed specifically with a garage in the same <br />footprint or location was approved by the previous lCouncil. <br />The builder, Ross Langhans, stated that the <br />additional 1 -1 %2' from the overhangs. <br />Sansevere noted that, typically, staff includes a re( <br />seemed to be lacking. <br />g inspectors stated they could likely garner an <br />with an application; which this <br />Gaffron stated that due to so many variables, staff Mound it difficult to make a recommendation; <br />however, a 10' side setback would be preferable to a 5' one. <br />Murphy suggested the applicant consider a higher <br />storage space above. <br />Langhans stated that they had designed the gai <br />survey and staff reports do not clearly identify <br />to the roofline in order to allow more <br />to match the home. He pointed out that the <br />fact that the garage sits within two zones. <br />• Nusbaum pointed out that a 22'X22' garage is 484 s.£, as opposed to the 440 s.f. as recommended <br />by the Planning Commission. He added that, several years ago when they had built their home, the <br />minutes will reflect that the City Council gave them permission to build a garage in the same <br />footprint as the current one. <br />Sansevere stated that he wished to see a 10' setback no matter if the garage was a single or 1 '/2 <br />story structure. <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt the Planning Commission recommendation with a <br />10' side setback for a 221X22' garage whether constructed as single or 1 '/Z story structure for <br />the garage located at 3480 North Shore Drive.. <br />Mrs. Nusbaum asked why they were not going to, be given the 5' option. <br />Murphy stated that the City Council failed to ide . <br />option. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*11. #05 -3137 ROBERT AND VICT( <br />VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 5362 <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to ad <br />granting a front yard setback variance for <br />a hardship to the land to support the 5' <br />JAFFRAY, 540 BARRETT AVENUE — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5362, a Resolution <br />Barrett Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0 <br />PAGE 5 of 10 <br />