Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 23, 2005 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• <br />U <br />(PUBLIC COMMENTS, Continued) <br />Moorse explained that a different access, as prop <br />this property, but the topographic issues would h <br />construction. The City agreed to pay to have the <br />be done to match the site to the intersection. <br />Though the delays due to the intersection are no <br />reflected in the record that this delay has adverse <br />commitments and timelines to move forward wi <br />Philip Carlson stated that he has seen estimates <br />topographies of the site. He maintained that he <br />clients and asked for a straight answer. <br />i by the consultants, would potentially benefit <br />to be resolved before proceeding with any <br />licants' engineer work out what would need to <br />ult of their own, Jenna Carlson wished to have it <br />affected them, as they have financial <br />interested businesses for these office spaces. <br />$150,000 to change the intersection and <br />ild not pass along that type of expenditure to his <br />Murphy suggested the Carlsons meet with staff and council members Tuesday afternoon to discuss <br />the specifics. While he apologized that the delay may be causing the Carlsons undo angst, Murphy <br />felt the information that staff had to share with them would be helpful, as the tumback of Highway <br />12 was more than a mere intersection change. Murphy acknowledged that it was unfortunate that <br />the Carlsons' project happened to fall within the same timeline as the tumback project, but also <br />pointed out the unique opportunity it affords them which could be further detailed Tuesday. <br />Jenna Carlson reiterated her objection that they were removed from the agenda this evening <br />without being given prior notice than this afternoon, nor any action plan. <br />Sansevere stated that, had the item been on the e` <br />due to the lack of information regarding the potei <br />needed to hear what the tumback committee had <br />recommendation. <br />Gaffron suggested that Engineer Kellogg attend t <br />Philip Carlson voiced his frustration that, in essei <br />intersection seems to be falling upon the burden i <br />should be shouldering the entire cost responsibili <br />intersection. <br />Murphy pointed out that the City paid the initial <br />would be feasible to expect that several business <br />access improvements because they each will ab; <br />ring's agenda, he would have tabled or denied it <br />i1 intersection change anyway. He felt he <br />share before making any kind of <br />meeting to answer questions Tuesday as well. <br />e, anything that is decided with regard to the <br />the applicant. He questioned why the applicant <br />of changes the city wishes to make to the <br />1,200 for the engineer's report, noting that it <br />along highway 12 will be sharing the cost of <br />.utely benefit from the changes. <br />PAGE 3 of 7 <br />