My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
05-23-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:50:31 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:53:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 23, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />*4. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 9, 2005 <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Minutes of May 9, 2005, as submitted. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*5. RECONVENED BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION MEETING MAY 9, <br />2005 <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Board of Appeals and Equalization <br />Minutes of May 9, 2005, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS — IRENE SILBER <br />No representative was present. — Park Tour June 6, 2005, 5:00 p.m. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS — RALPH KEMPF <br />Kempf stated that he had nothing to report, but would remain for questions. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />• <br />Jenna Carlson and Philip Carlson, of Interspace Inc., P.O Box 184, Wayzata, were present to • r <br />express their surprise and frustration to learn this afternoon that their item was not to be reviewed <br />among the items on the agenda this evening. It was their opinion that they were given preliminary <br />approval on April 26, 2005, only to be in limbo regarding when they may begin construction, due <br />to a proposed intersection change that they've learned they may be financially responsible to <br />contribute to. <br />Gaffron stated that, over the past two weeks, the applicants have delayed the process with <br />incomplete documents. He acknowledged that the project appears to be in limbo on both sides, as <br />the City is in the decision making phase regarding the intersection based on recommendations from <br />the consultants and the applicants are in limbo in other areas. <br />Philip Carlson stated that he expected the application to be heard this evening and that things were <br />moving forward based on his most recent conversations with staff. <br />Moorse stated that he had discussed with Philip Carlson on Friday that the application would not be <br />on the agenda because several things were still up in the air, including information from a turnback <br />meeting on Highway 12, which he had attended this morning and was scheduled to discuss with the <br />Carlsons on Tuesday afternoon. <br />Jenna Carlson insisted that the City provide them with an action plan that they could share with <br />their potential lessees and point to as they proceed. She questioned whether the City intended that <br />the applicants put in the frontage road, and stated that these additional costs would be a heavy <br />burden for them. <br />PAGE 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.