03-14-2005 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, March 14, 2005 7:00 o'clock p.m. • ( #05 -3078 Gary and Lynn Christensen, Continued) Christensen stated he would like to start construction on the garage once the house is completed and that he is hopeful the project could be completed by the end of the summer. Sansevere suggested putting a deadline for when the shed has to be removed. Curtis noted a variance would be required to raise the pitch of the roof.. Christensen commented his neighbor is fine with McMillan inquired how Staff would enforce the Gaffron stated one option would be to require Murphy inquired whether the applicant is in Christensen indicated he is willing to remove the removal of the other items mentioned by staff. the pitch of the roof on the garage. of the shed in the future. of the shed prior to final inspection. to remove the shed in the future. Christensen noted he also is in agreement with Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution for Application #05 -3078, 3560 Ivy Place, subject to conditions one and two outlined in the March 8, 2005 Planner's Report, and further subject to the understanding that the shed may be • used for temporary storage through construction but must be removed by the applicants' move in date or December 1, 2005. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 8. #05 -3080 INTERSPACE WEST, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST — PUD — CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW ;I Gina and Philip Carlson, Interspace West, and Daniel Kaplan, Attorney -at -Law, were present. Gundlach stated at the last City Council meeting the ?applicants were directed to redesign the architecture for the proposed townhouse /office units. The applicants have submitted a revised elevation view in an attempt to incorporate what was discussed at the last'meeting. Gundlach indicated a pitched roof with a more traditional entryway has been incorporated into the design, with the new units having access through a shared entrance in the center of the building rather than on the end of the unit. The applicants are still proposing the buildings to be constructed in clusters and contain the same amount of square footage as the previous proposal. Gundlach noted the changes do not affect the parking layout, the finished floor elevations of the units, or remaining wall heights and elevations. Staff is requesting the Council determine if the architectural revisions are adequate, and if the revisions meet Council's expectations, to direct staff to draft a resolution approving the concept plan for approval at • the next meeting. PAGE 9 1