My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 4:23:19 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:15:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
540
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSTON <br /> Monday,August 21,2006 <br /> " 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> . (#06-3225 875 BWB,LLC,Continued) <br /> . Jurgens cominented there is not much vegetation along the Luce Line presently and that the power line <br /> � easement may limit a person's abitity to put vegetation in that area. <br /> . . � Johnston stated tlie easement is located entirely vyithin the right-of-way of the Luce Line. <br /> �. . Bremer commented in her view the property owners would prefer the screeiiin�. <br /> �- Jurgens stated he would prefer a slope with ve;etation rather than a wall. <br /> � . • " � _ Bremer inquired whether the Plannin�Commission is�agreeable to a maaimum of 30 feet building height. <br /> � Carlson stated the buildi�lg height would be 28 feet. ' <br /> Jurgens stated it was his understandin�there would be a restrictiotl on the peak height 'in the ' • <br /> comprehensive plan amendment. � � <br /> Gaffron stated the Council elected not to include that restriction iil the comprehensive plait amendment � . <br /> � and that they would like that item to be discussed in conjunction with:the approval process. <br /> � . � Jurgens stated he would like the roof pitch not to exceed 12/12. <br /> � . Gaffron concurred that the pitch peak should be discussed in conjunction with the approval process. <br /> � . Bremer inquired whetlier the Planninb Commission is okay with a depth of at least 20 feet. <br /> � Gaffron stated that is not an issue since all the units meet that requirement. <br /> Bremer inquired whether there would be any accessory structures. • <br /> Carlson indicated there would not be. • . ' <br /> • Bremer commented the little bump-outs along the roadway work nice in Stonebay and suogested the . <br /> • applicant consider adding those in this development. - � <br /> ' Johnston stated they would look at that. Johnston noted the middle of the development consists of a rain � <br /> garden. � � <br /> Gaffron inquired whether there would be two-way traffic in the circle. <br /> Johnston stated there could be t�vo-way traffic. <br /> J�u•gens sugge-sted that perhaps the road�vay i►1 that area be iticreased to 2�4 feet. <br /> - P.�,GL ?1 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.