My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 4:23:19 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:15:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
540
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NIII�TUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION . <br /> Monday,August 21,2006 <br /> � 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> . (#06-3225 875 WBW,LLC,Continued) <br /> � � Kemp�inquired whether the only windows would be the Iti?her transient windows. • <br /> Carlson indicated tl�at is their intention. � • <br /> , . Jurgens stated there are issues with the Fire Code that would have to be addressed. <br /> �Kempf indicated he is in agreement that the wetlands be included in the outlot. <br /> . Kempf commented that the neighbor buffer would be taken away with the zero ]ot line and that he does <br /> � not see the advantage to it. <br /> Carlson stated the advantage relates to the interior layout of the units and that thece would be essentially a � � <br /> . wall there with the transient windows located up higher. <br /> � Gaffron stated a three-foot separation may be necessary to have transient windows. . <br /> Rahn stated there are issues with a zero foot lot lii�e and suggested the applicants consider at least three � <br /> feet between the units. � _ . - � <br /> � � Johnston stated the building code is the biggest issue with the zero lot line. � � <br />� Kroeger inquired whether there would be an egress issue with the zero lot line. <br /> � � Carlson stated the bedrooms would be located on the other side of the unit and that egress may be an issue <br /> if someone would like to put a bedroom in that area. . <br /> . Gaffron pointed out Unit 8 is right up against a steep slope and that he has a concern there is iiot going to <br /> be ample screening from the Luce Line. <br /> Kempf indicated he did walk the Luce Line this afternoon and that there are a number of houses that are . <br /> very close to the Luce Line that do not have much screening. Ke►npf stated there are also power lines that. . . • . <br /> run between this properly and the Luce Line and that it appears the view from the Luce Line is not a � <br /> . significant issue�iven the elevated power lines and the lower rooflines. � , <br /> Jurgens inquired whetller the Planning Commission would prefer a vegetated slope versus a retaining � <br /> wal l. <br /> Kroeger commented that walls tend to be more danaerous. <br /> " Rahn inquired whether the slope at its steepest is a 1:1 slope. <br /> Gaffron stated there is a 1:1 slope for approximately 15 feet. <br /> i�:�GF Z(1 ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.