Laserfiche WebLink
' , � - <br /> �^ � <br /> MTNUTES OF THE _-- <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> � G —�.�--�7 <br /> Monday,August 21,2006 <br /> . � 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> . � (#06-3221 Sean and Nicolie Hendrickson,Continued) <br /> . � Rahn moved,Kempf seconded,to recommend approval of Application#06-3221,Sean and Nicolie <br /> '. � Hendrickson, 1580 Long Lake Boulevard,granting of setback coverage variances as depicted on the <br /> newly revised�plan. VOTEs Ayes 4,Nays 1,Jurgens Opposed. <br /> � Jurgens indicated he is not coinfortable with movina this application forward to the City Council without � <br /> a,complete plan review by the Planning Com�nission. <br /> 8. #06-3224 THOMAS AND REBECCA LOWE,3295 CARMAN ROAD,VARIANCE <br /> Bremer moved,Kroeger seconded,to table Application#06-3224,Thomas and Rebecca Lowe,3295 <br /> • Carman Road. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. ' • <br /> .� � ` .�� . 9. #06-3225 875 WBW,LLC,,875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST,SUBDIVISION, " <br /> . � 8:22 P.M.=9:32 P.M. . . � . . <br /> � Steve Johnston of Landform, and David Carlson of WBW,LLC,were present. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting approval for a nine-unit residential development on this former . <br /> New Horizons daycare site. The property is the subject of a comprehensive plan amendment to allow <br /> �� .. � � density of approximately 1.4 units per dry buildable acre,where the current density maxiinum is 0.5 units <br /> . per acre. This amendment has received preliminary Council acceptance and will be on the Council's <br /> . agenda for action on August 28`�'. The Council is expected to take formal action to conditionally adopt <br /> : � the amendment on August 28 and direct Staff to forward it to Metropolitan Council for approval. <br /> . � The Park Commission made a recommendation to require park dedication fees and not a land dedication. <br /> � � Gaffron stated the intent of this review is to provide direction to the applicants and that no formal action <br /> : � is required. The draft CMP amend�ment is intended to apply to just the applicant's property and no others. <br /> It should be noted that in addition to the permitted, conditional and accessory uses allowed within the . <br /> . � RR-1 B zoning district,this amendment allows for resideutial development of the property at a density of <br /> � ' one unit per 0.70 dry buildable acres(1.43 units per acre). It then goes on to establish parameters for any �.� <br /> residential development of the property at a density greater than 0.5 units per acre of dry buildable land. <br /> ' Those include the following: <br /> � _ l. Such development shall be subject to the PUD development process and shall be rezoned to . <br /> RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development. The entire property shall be developed as a single , <br /> PUD project. <br /> � .P�G�' 16 . . • , . <br /> . ry'M , . � • <br /> ' >. . . ' <br />