Laserfiche WebLink
. . � <br /> � FILE#07-3279 <br /> ' � 12 April 2007 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> appear very much as one building. Considering the location of the closest adjacent ' <br /> property owner to the proposed building(s) the Planning Commission may want to <br /> consider requiring an additional setback from the property owner to the west. Similarly, <br /> ' the applicant has a considerable amount of acreage, and perhaps an additional setback <br /> from the rear lot line is appropriate as well. Additionally, in light of the mainland <br /> regulations regarding accessory building sizes and the applicant's property area, staff <br /> finds that it may be reasonable to allow constniction of a 2,000 s.f. building on the � <br /> � applicant's property. � <br /> Issues for Consideration _ � � �� <br /> 1. In reference to the RS requirements regarding accessory buildings, does the . <br /> ` Planning Coinmission feel that the number of additional accessory buildings on � <br /> the property should be reduced? ' , <br /> 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? . <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of a variance to allow a single 2,000 s.f. building to <br /> be constructed on lhe property with any additional conditions the Planning Commission ' <br /> deems appropriate. . . <br /> . <br /> i � <br /> � <br />