My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 4:23:19 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:15:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
540
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Snyder Drug(cont.) <br /> OPINION: Good location, access,overall site characteristics, signage and questionable paxking field. <br /> Probably the lowest rent structure. However,the site is limited in size, aesthetics, <br /> expansion capabilities, deliveries and parking. Based on the projected store size need for <br /> this market,this site would not allow for the full xetail floor,community room or most <br /> likely, on-site fresh deli operation. <br /> Good but limited option. <br /> SITE 4: Brown Road &Hwy. 12 Re-development site—Long Lake <br /> '`��. � � <br /> ,.1.=� <br /> ;�•1 <br /> ��:. <br /> � a' ,`� + � r�' <br /> � . <br /> F,.. �.. _ _ _ ......._ <br /> R - _ <br /> PROS: Excellent visibility. <br /> Signalized intersection—hard corner. <br /> Somewhat pedestrian friendly. <br /> CONS: Site purchase must include residential homes to the west. Acquisition and demolition <br /> costs very high. <br /> City requiring Urban design to exterior property lines. Also requesting Mixed Use <br /> development to include office or residential component. <br /> With residential acquisition,too large. Without acquisition,too small for projected <br /> building. <br /> Questionable access from Brown Road and Go To Work side of Hwy. i 2. <br /> OPINION: Outstanding location but with residential acquisition requirements,the site is very <br /> expensive. The Coop developers would be required to become a multi-use developer <br /> because the site is too large. In addition, it is our understanding�Iiat MNDOT continues <br /> to own the primary site. This would need to be resolved prior to purchase from city. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.