Laserfiche WebLink
" � Curtis suggested the Plamling Comniission discuss the merits of applying the wetland buffer � <br /> requirement to mitigate what miaht poteiltially be seen as negative impacts from the e�isting structure <br /> and the proposed additions. Curtis stated the applicant is not increasing the hardcover but questioned <br /> whether there should be some consideration of the runoff into the wetland. <br /> Gaffron stated the proposed work on the properiy does not trigger the creation of a wet(and buffer,but <br /> - since there,are a variety of variances being requested as part of this application,there is a question • <br /> whether some buffer requirement should be included to mitigate the runoff into the wetland. <br /> (#07-3262 Alexander Design Group,Continued) <br /> Rahn inquired what tlle]lardcover would be. . <br /> Curtis stated based upon the applicants' latest submittal,the hardcover would remain at 27.3 by <br /> removing some driveway and reconfiguriilg their proposal. <br /> Rahn stated the proposed building additions totally tnax out the height and that, in his opinion, is not a <br /> good idea to do that this ctose to the lake. Rahn indicated he would like to see a side elevation of the <br /> existing house and the proposed house. Rahn stated it appears the first floor would be higher and the <br /> roof would be higher but that he would like to see a drawing depictina how much taller the new <br /> addition would be as compared to the existing roofline. <br /> � Kempf stated he is in agreement with Chair Rahn and that it would have a visual impact from the lake. <br /> Kempf stated he would like to see the house pushed back,which probably is not going to happen. <br /> Zullo inquired whether the deck would be reconstructed. <br /> Alexander stated the deck would be left as is and that they would not be adding to it. <br /> Gaffron noted there was a variance�ranted for the deck a number of years ago. <br /> Chair Rahn opened the public hearing at 8:38 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Rahn closed the public hearin�at 8:38 p.m. <br />. Alexander inquired if the heiaht were decreased, how the Planning Commission would deal with Staff <br /> clefinin� it as three�toi•ies. <br /> Gaffron suggested the roof be reduced slightly, which would help to decrease the visual massin;of tlie <br /> structure. <br /> Rahn stated he is not sure ho«�the seven feet ceilin�height impacts the six foot in the �round. <br /> � Gaffron stated a seven-foot ceilin�height���ould be considered substandard by most people. � <br />