Laserfiche WebLink
�07-3259 1374 Rest Point Road <br /> April 11,2007 � <br /> Page 5 . <br /> City Engineer's Comments <br />� Tlie City Engineer reviewed the grading and drainage plan submitted with the initial proposal and <br /> � provided written comments (Exhibit H of 2/15/07 memo). He has not had a chance to review the <br /> most recent're'visions. The site gradin�is seen by staff as iiot substantially affecting the site layout <br /> or hardcover ��ar'iance review. Staff would su;gest that if this application is moved forward by <br /> . . Planning Coinmission, any identified engineering issues need to be resolti�ed before this is <br /> . � preseizted to Council. <br /> Issues for Consideration � . <br /> � . 1. '" � �• Should the pool be allowed to remain in conjunction �vith this project that is bein� <br /> considered as a total rebuild? Is there any justification for a hardcover variance in either � <br /> � � zone? It can be argtied that the pool is the sole reason for the hardcover variances <br /> � . needed. The proposed house has been relocated and modified so that�it can be constructed <br /> and attacl�ed to the �arage without the neecl for any variances other than the 9.1' existin� <br /> �arage setback. With over 4500 s.f of hardcover allowance, the lot certainly has the <br /> ability to contain thc proposed 2?50 s.f. of house and gara;e and the triple-wide 850 s.f. <br /> � of etistin�driveway, plus a few other amenities. , <br /> • � Does Plannina Commission have any concerns about connectin� the house to the garage . <br /> y when tlle garage has a slightly substandard side setbacic? . <br /> 3. Because removal of the princip�.l building aut�matica?ly trigaers the p��o��is?ons of� <br /> � Section 78-143?,requiring removal of non-conforizZing accessory structures and requiring <br /> � . an `agreement' for retention of conforming accessoiy structures, a variance to this section <br /> �. � is technically required in order to retain the garage and/or the pool. <br /> � Utaii 1�Zl.V111411�'i�iLL4+l�lVli <br /> � � Plaruzing Coinmission should determitle: <br /> �� 1. Whether applicants should be granted a hardcover variance to be allowed to �eep the <br /> pool, given that it is nonconforming and partially in the 0-7�' zone, and that it is the <br /> . primary reason for excess hardcover on the site... <br /> � 2. Whether a hardcover variance should be �ranted for the 75-250' zone, given that this is . <br /> considered as a total rebuild on a lot that is nearly conformin� in width and has a <br /> substantial hardcover allotment for the 75-250' zone... . <br /> � ;, Whether there is any issue with attachinQ house to the e�istin, yarage that is sli�htly too <br /> close to tlle lot line... <br /> Piaiuiin, C�mi��ission's opticns ir.ciz��e: <br /> - ma�in,� a recommendution on the abo�°e topics and mo<<e thi� fo��«�ard t� Council: or <br /> - table for fut�ther revision�. �ivin� applicant clear dir�ction as to ���hat revisions are expected <br />