Laserfiche WebLink
.�,�..; <br /> , �. , ; <br /> , . . � �. � . . <br /> � Date Application�Received: 12-20-06 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete: 2-2-07 � <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 4-3-07 . <br /> TO: Chair Kempf and Orono P1arulin� Commission , <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator � � _. <br /> � <br /> t <br /> � FROM: Mil:e Gaffron, Plaruiing Director -�• . <br /> . . . ���''^�-' . . <br /> � � DATE: April 11, 2007 � <br /> . - .. . - <br /> • . r>•a..-`� . <br /> SUBJECT:�#07-3259 Lake �ountry Builders for Kathy & Gary Gangstee, 1374 Rest Point . <br /> ' � � � - � .- Road. -Variances -REVISED PLANS -Public Hearin; <br /> .. . . .3-19-07: TABLED WITHOUT DISCUSSION AT APPLICANT'S REQUEST <br /> � Zoning District: LR-1B, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1-acre/140' minimum <br /> ., � Lot Area/Width: 28,500 s.f. (0.65 acres) / 131' @ shoreline, 138' @ 75' setback <br /> Application Status: The applicants have submitted a revised site plan, revised buildin� <br /> . plans and e?evatio»s, and r�vised laardcover calculations. In these new plans, the eaisting <br /> . �• house will be�completely reinoved, and a new 2-story home of a�proximately the same 1250 <br /> � � � s.f. footprint area and oriented east-west rather than noi-th-south will be constructed to meet the <br /> required 30' street setback. The �-story connecting link to the gara;e is still proposed. As�a . <br /> ' result of these revisions, and the consideration of this site as a total replacemenE, the only <br /> varzances required are: - � � � <br /> � • 1} lot area (0.65 acre where 1.0 acre is required); <br /> - 2) hardcover: 75-250' zone: 27.4% proposed where 3U.3% exists and'25% is allowed; � <br /> � 0-7�' zone: 7.72% proposed where 9.0% eYists and 0% is allowed; and . <br /> 3) side setbacl:for existing garage attachment and upward expansion: 9.1' existing where <br /> 10' is required. <br /> _.4) va.riance to Section 78-1432 re: Accessory Structures (see Exh. F and page 5) <br /> One of the property owners' goals continues to be the ability to retain the nonconforming pool � <br /> • which is partially within the 0-.75' zone. <br /> Staff Recorr_►tr_e►zclation: • � <br /> � The applicants have responded to the Plannin� Commission's direction from the February <br /> meeting. The primary issue for Plannina Commission to consider is �vhether or to what <br /> ��� extent a hardcover variance is appropriate for the site. Planning Commission should . <br /> � address: � <br /> -Whether applicants should be granted a hardcover variance to be allowed to keep the <br /> pooL given that it is nonconformin� and partially in the 0-7�' zone; and that it is the � <br /> • primary reason for e�cess hardcover on the site... <br /> -��Ihether a hardcover variance should be Qranted for the 7�-2�0` zone, given that this is <br /> considered as a total rebuild on a lot that is nearly conformin� in �4�idth and has a <br /> substantial hardco��er allotment for the 7�-?�0' zone... � . <br /> - �,Uhetl.ier there is anv issu� ���ith attachin� house to the e�istin�� Qara�e that is sli;htly <br /> i t,J, `i,�c� *v� rii� i�,c lis�� � <br /> � �. _ . . . _ . <br />