My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
11-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:28:14 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 4:28:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
07-3334 � <br /> 14 November 2007 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> Conformity with Zoning District Lot Requirements <br /> The property is in the RR — 1 B, One Family Rural Residential District, which allows for <br /> , single family residential uses with a minimum lot size of two dry buildable acres. Each <br /> proposed lot is intended to contain the minimum of 2.00 acres of dry buildable land. Lot ` <br /> 1 is proposed to contain 2.37 dry acres and Lot 2 is proposed to contain 4.78 dry acres. <br /> Lot 2 appears to conform to all of the RR-1 B minimum requirements; Lot 1 also appears . <br /> to conform to the RR-1 B minimums with the exception of the width at the road. Lot 1 is <br /> proposed to have a width of t170 at the street; however it is similar in width to the other <br /> lots in the Graham Hill Preserve development and has a functional width of 200' at the <br /> 50' front setback line. Lot 1 is proposed to access off of the newly created Graham Hill <br /> Road within the Graham Hill Preserve development. <br /> Lot Layout and Lot Standards <br /> The proposed lots shown on the proposed plan are fairly regularly shaped. Lot 2 will <br /> access off of High Lane as it currently does; Lot 1 will access off of Graham Hill Road. It <br /> appears the home on Lot 2 would maintain the existing driveway. <br /> Septic reports have been submitted and reviewed by the City Septic Inspector and have <br /> been determined to be suitable sites. <br /> Park/Trail Easement/Fees or Dedication Needed <br /> The CMP indicates that no future trails are proposed along Watertown Road. Staff will <br /> recommend that the new lots be subject to the standard 8% Park Dedication Fee. . <br /> Road Improvements and/or Easements Needed <br /> Dedication of a 50' corridor through Lot 2 is required in order to provide for the <br /> continuation of High Lane to the next property to the west. The City requires standard <br /> perimeter and drainage easements around all property boundaries in the plat. <br /> Stormwater and Drainage Improvements � <br /> � The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee, established <br /> currently at $3,050 per acre for the 2-acre zone. <br /> Utility Locations and Availability <br /> The property would be served by septic systems and private wells. All septic systems <br /> must be located 20' from all property boundaries and 10' from all structures. Private . <br /> water supply wells shall be setback 3' from structures and 50' from all septic systems. <br /> The applicant has provided septic location reports for both lots; these locations appear to <br /> be acceptable. <br /> Wetlands on Site and/or Impacted <br /> The applicants submitted a wetland delineation report. The report indicates that there <br /> are no wetlands impacting the subject property. <br /> Issues for Discussion <br /> 1. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to the City <br /> Engineer's recommendations, both John Smyth and Darren Amundsen. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.