Laserfiche WebLink
t. <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 8, 2007 <br />(8. #07 -3315 DONNA AND MICHAEL EBERTZ,1220 TONKAWA ROAD, Continued) • <br />Sharratt indicated there would be gutters and downspouts on both the upper and lower rooflines. <br />McMillan inquired what the width of the -other overhangs are. <br />Sharratt indicated they are at two feet. <br />Rahn stated in his opinion the increase in hardcover from approximately 30 percent to 50 percent is a <br />large increase. <br />Curtis noted approximately one -half of the existing house is located in the 0 -75 foot zone. <br />Sharratt stated originally they proposed to have a one -story porch in the existing footprint area, which <br />was later eliminated when the house was brought all the way into the 75 -250 foot zone. Sharratt stated <br />this is a unique situation and that if there was another home located next to this house, this lot would be <br />within its hardcover limits. Sharratt noted the structural coverage is proposed at 9.4 percent and that the <br />higher amount of hardcover seems reasonable given the unique circumstances. <br />Rahn noted the size of the house has increased from what currently exists. <br />Sharratt pointed out this is a one acre lot in Orono and that it is not large in comparison to a number of <br />other homes in the area. <br />McMillan inquired whether there are other benefits that would be gained from having the larger • <br />overhang. <br />Sharratt stated if a gutter is not installed on the upper roofline, the water would come down and splash <br />against the windows. Sharratt commented the office would be used a great deal and that the larger <br />overhang would allow them to preserve the view of the lake and help block the sun. <br />White stated another issue is the shed, which Staff has recommended be removed. <br />Sharratt noted that the shed and retaining wall is the only hardcover remaining in the 0 -75 foot zone. <br />Ebertz stated he would be willing to remove the shed if necessary and that the shed is utilized for <br />storage of his lawnmower and other lawn, equipment. Ebertz stated there is limited storage in the <br />garage. <br />Murphy stated he personally would like to see the shed either removed or relocated. <br />White concurred that the shed should be removed from the 0 -75 foot zone. <br />Ebertz inquired whether they could retain the shed until the house is completed. <br />Curtis noted the City does have an agreement they could require the applicant to sign that the City has <br />the right to demolish the shed if the structure is not removed following construction. <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, Application #07 -3315, Donna and Michael Ebertz 1220 • <br />Tonkawa Road, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution, granting of a variance for the six- <br />PAGE 4 of 10 <br />4 <br />