My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
10-08-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:08:40 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:57:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />9 <br />r <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY' :COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday,! October 8, 2007 <br />8. #07 -3315 DONNA AND MICHAEL <br />1220 TONKAWA ROAD — VARIANCE <br />Mike Sharratt, Architect, and Mike Ebertz, Applicant, were present. <br />Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to ca <br />The applicants' lot is quite unique in that it has <br />classification wetland impacting the buildable <br />most of the zoning requirements. The initial pi <br />into the 75 -foot setback. <br />Based on the Planning Commission's recomme <br />the entire home and all new hardcover will be i <br />overhang. The applicants are requesting a vari� <br />foot zone. An existing boulder retaining wall s <br />to Staff. The applicants would like to allow an <br />five feet from the OHWL. <br />struct a new 4,400 square foot home on their property. <br />considerable amount of lakeshore and "preserve" <br />-ea. The applicants have proposed a home which meets <br />iposal included a portion of the home which extended <br />ttion, the applicants have revised their plans so that <br />do the 75 -250 foot zone with the exception of an <br />to allow 50.8 percent hardcover within the 75 -250 <br />-m will remain in the 0 -75 foot zone and is acceptable <br />square foot shed to remain within the 0 -75 foot zone, <br />The overhang on the south side of the home around the office portion of the home will extend <br />approximately six feet into the 75 -foot setback. The applicants have not proposed hardcover under this <br />overhang as it is primarily to shade the office area from the southern exposure. The overhang is <br />approximately 10 feet above grade. The Planning Commission generally felt that this overhang <br />encroachment into the setback was not an issue.! A 1.5 foot overhang is permitted to encroach into a <br />setback area and up to a two foot overhang does pot impact hardcover. The entire six foot overhang <br />would be considered hardcover by the City's policy standard and code. <br />As part of the grading plan, the applicant is prop <br />requested additional details on the rain garden fc <br />a letter indicating they would supply the details <br />is fine with that procedure. I <br />On September 17, 2007, the Planning Commi <br />requested. The dissenting Commissioner felt <br />in order to reduce the level of hardcover prop <br />Staff recommends approval of the level of 75• <br />plans. Staff would, however, recommend the <br />all overhangs meet the code requirements. <br />White stated he is pleased to see that the apl <br />Commission's recommendation and that the <br />Sharratt stated the overhang is designed to <br />a view of the lake. <br />Murphy stated the overhang in his view is an al <br />Murphy inquired what the plan is for capturing <br />Sharratt stated they have proposed a rain garden <br />willing to submit an overall landscape plan to St <br />Murphy inquired whether there would be gutters <br />sing to construct a rain garden. The City Engineer has <br />review and approval. The applicants have submitted <br />part of the building permit application process. Staff <br />on voted 3 -1 to recommend approval of the variance as <br />it the footprint of the proposed home could be reduced <br />'I- <br />foot hardcover variance requested per the revised <br />)val of the shed within the 0 -75 foot setback and that <br />t has revised his plans based upon the Planning <br />outstanding issue is the overhang. <br />the room from the southern exposure and still provide <br />five amenity to the house given the rest of the layout. <br />runoff off of the roof. <br />help capture the runoff and that they would be <br />for their review. <br />downspouts installed. <br />PAGE 3 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.