Laserfiche WebLink
-�.:!�u..".i"w� '.�.63.�.";�s;oC:+'��Wtl�:t6ii.',a '-Ft..::ta-•'v:,:i:�,c'�`.y:&;.iiiiL:3s:�e.:.".tt6.�'s'S�a:u`::i3"�w'sY1!'i- ^�i�•+��tSw".�.:� - � >>•:-,.r..�.e�a'_::.;eeca.fh..:il,;.'.� '�:�'.:t.S;�ta7.vuru.:.'»i�t^......iu.c�.l:•1.5u:�..sl:a::s.:+w�4s�'t..., <br /> r_ . <br /> .�.,y . ,. , . .aw ;-:�:� . s .. _ __ _ .. _ , � <br /> _ .� -. ..,..3,,, p.. . .. .. . r ..: . .. .� ... . . . . . <br /> c�t� o� oR,oNO . -.. <br /> • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � <br /> � NO. 2712 <br /> • • • • <br /> A RESOLIITION GRANTING <br /> � AN AFTER-TH$-FACT VARIANCE TO <br /> � MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 12 <br /> FILE #1456 <br /> . WHER$AS, Robert & Janet Emfield (hereinafter "the <br /> applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2240 Devin <br /> Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally . <br /> described as follows: <br /> Lot 5, Block 1, The Nursery, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for an <br /> after-the-fact variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, <br /> Subdivision 12 to permit the construction of a detached garage <br /> located 5.3' from the principal residence structure on the <br /> property, where a 10' structure-to-structure setback is normally <br /> required. <br /> • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br /> Orono, Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1456. <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Single Family <br /> Rural. Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br /> on September 18, 1989, � and recommended approval of the <br /> af ter-the-f act variance .based upon the f o 11 owing f indings: <br /> A) The garage was constructed without the required <br /> building permit, but inspections were made of the <br /> garage during its construction while a permitted deck <br /> was also being constructed on the property. The <br /> property owners were not advised until after the <br /> ' construction was completed that a structure-to- <br /> structure setback variance was necessary. <br /> Page 1 of 5 � <br /> • <br />