My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
08-27-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:08:11 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:54:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 27, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(3. #07 -3291 ED COX ON BEHALF OF PA UL AND LA URA EKHOLM, 2606 WEST <br />LAFAYETTE ROAD, Continued) <br />the final planning stages with the homeowner, but the general footprint of the plans had been decided <br />upon. The bulk of the additions consisted of a new garage to be located mostly within the 75 -250 foot <br />zone with some roof alterations resulting in the plan as shown in Exhibit B to the Planner's Report. <br />With the building permit application, the applicant submitted the revised plans (Exhibit A), which did <br />not change the approved footprint but resulted in a roof height increase within the 75 -foot setback. <br />The proposed increase in height does not appear to negatively affect the views of the lake enjoyed by <br />the adjacent property owners. The proposed lower level garage door must be reduced to less than eight <br />feet in width in order to meet the hardcover as proposed. <br />Curtis noted the City did receive a letter from each of the adjoining property owners indicating they are <br />not opposed to the change. <br />Curtis requested the City Council either refer the applicant back to the Planning Commission for after - <br />the -fact consideration of the two -foot increase in roof height within the 75 -foot setback area or direct <br />Staff to amend Resolution No. 5629 to allow the excess height without further variance. <br />White commented he does not feel the revision substantially impacts the view and that he does not have <br />an issue with the change. <br />Rahn concurred that the change is a minor change. • <br />Bremer inquired what basis the Council should be looking at on whether or not to send an'application <br />back to the Planning Commission. <br />Curtis stated in her opinion it is likely that the Planning Commission would put this application on the <br />Consent Agenda. <br />Murphy concurred that the City Council should have some type of guidelines to follow on which <br />applications should go back to the Planning Commission for their review. <br />Bremer moved, Murphy seconded, to direct Staff to amend RESOLUTION NO. 5629, <br />a Resolution Granting Variances for the Property Located at 2606 West Lafayette Road, to, <br />approve the two -foot increase in roof height within the 75 -foot setback area. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />4. #07 -3306 GEORGE STICKNEY ON BEHALF OF BRUCE PADDOCK, 1450 -1500 <br />BRACKETTS POINT ROAD — FINAL PLAT AND STREET VACATION — RESOLUTION <br />NOS. 5651 and 5652 <br />George Stickney and Bruce Paddock, Applicants, were present. <br />Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting final plat approval for relocating lot boundaries, creation of a <br />tennis court outlot, creation of a new outlot corridor for a private segment of Bracketts Point Road, and <br />• <br />PAGE 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.