My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-11-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:07:36 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:50:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />LJ <br />• <br />OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 11, 2007 <br />7:00 o' clock p.m. <br />(3. #07 -3266 VOGUE HOMESONB. <br />1404 BALDUR PARKROAD, Continued) <br />Turner stated staff wanted the Council to consi( <br />nor the hardcover had changed. Turner noted f <br />be given. <br />Rahn expressed his surprise that the gambrel <br />John Vogstrom, applicant's representative, st <br />by the Planning Commission, he questioned <br />demo permits, and City code, the applicant is <br />of hardcover, which they felt they had compI <br />OF KAREN AND BENJAMIN MILBRA TH, <br />the new building plan since neither the footprint <br />the applicant had requested that more direction <br />met the cities definition of the half story. <br />i that having followed the guidelines as provided <br />.t problems persist. He indicated that based on his <br />owed 15% or 1500 sf. structural cover and 3000 sf. <br />with. <br />Although he had not attended the previous City Council meeting, Vogstrom questioned how the <br />drainage plan could not meet the City Engineers approval, acknowledging that this is a difficult <br />property with regard to drainage. He explained that, in his engineer's estimation, the proposed 6" <br />drain pipe following the 6" incline should be adequate. <br />Murphy questioned the height of the proposed berms on either side of the property and believed the <br />proposed grades of those slopes of 2:1 or 3:1 were too steep for such a narrow lot. <br />Gaffron pointed out that the berms were more <br />Kellogg interjected that 3:1 grades still show <br />particularly at the southwest corner where the <br />will go. <br />Vogstrom suggested that Kellogg meet with <br />that will work. <br />Gaffron stated that, clearly, the survey is not c <br />accurately reflect the flow of water. He reque: <br />to see the grades better and agreed getting the <br />would be a good start. <br />Charles Reid, 1400 Baldur Park Road, pointed c <br />reflect the discussion with regard to the hardcov <br />applicant purchased the property, he questioned <br />previous structure, hardcover, and setback limit <br />addition, Reid questioned at what point the aver <br />being taken at the corner of his home to the con: <br />Reid added that the neighbor at 1412 Baldur P <br />see the hardcover kept to the 25% standard. <br />Mayor White explained that the average <br />properties. <br />a slight swale than berm. <br />in numerous locations throughout the property, <br />rvey arrows incorrectly display where the runoff <br />, Gronberg, to come up with a solution <br />6sistent within itself, as drainage arrows do not <br />�d the applicant supply the city with a larger survey <br />�o engineers together to discuss the application <br />that the previous Minutes do not accurately <br />As there was a home on the site when the <br />what point the lot became `vacant' and the <br />ms became moot in the proposed calculations. In <br />lakeshore setback measurement changed from <br />of the deck. <br />Road, although he could not attend, wished to <br />ire setback is calculated from the two neighboring <br />PAGE 3 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.