My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-04-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
05-04-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:07:23 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:49:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 14, 2007 . <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #07 -3278 John Terrance Homes, Continued) <br />On Friday, May 11 `h, Staff and the Mayor met with the applicants to discuss the process for moving <br />forward with the proposal for retail use of Outlot A. It was suggested that Staff and Council would <br />formulate a set of questions and required submittals for a sketch plan review of the proposed uses since <br />the co -op was not prepared to submit all of the detail normally required for a PUD application without <br />some degree of assurance that the use would be acceptable. <br />The applicants were advised that some type of disposition of the current CMP amendment application <br />needs to be made by the Council and that once that is done, a sketch plan PUD review may be an <br />appropriate next step. <br />Murphy stated his comments should not be interpreted tonight as evidence that he is opposed to the food <br />co -op or bank on this site but that he has experienced frustration on this application given the number of <br />times this application has been tabled. Murphy stated the applicants should withdraw their application <br />and resubmit it when they are ready or the Council should deny the application. <br />Murphy stated he is unclear whether the resolution before the Council is appropriate and that in his <br />opinion the Planning Commission maybe should not have dealt with this matter in the way that it did. At <br />the time the Council changed the City's Comprehensive Plan approximately three years ago they did so in <br />good faith and the application for this site later fell through. <br />Murphy noted Orono's Comprehensive Plan states the following: "Orono will coordinate its commercial <br />development planning related to Highway 12 area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Long Lake <br />downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downtown retail area, <br />and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono." Murphy stated a <br />great deal of discussion went into development of the Comprehensive Plan fifteen years ago and that the <br />City of Long Lake and the City of Orono should sit down together and discuss the retail area of Long <br />Lake. _ <br />Murphy stated the three points raised in Staff's report provide a good basis for denying the application <br />and that he has a concern with additional retail space being added to Orono given the amount of empty <br />retail space currently in the Long Lake area. Murphy stated he also has a concern that Staff has not <br />adequately addressed the impacts of retail on the surrounding residential area. Murphy stated the <br />previous City Attorney recommended that the best process to follow in this situation would be to pursue a <br />PUD. <br />McMillan stated the focus on the CMP amendment is unfortunate and has possibly created some <br />confusion on the best way to proceed with this site. McMillan stated the Council is interested in the food <br />co -op but that the amendment is not the best way to achieve the desired result. McMillan stated she <br />would like to see a PUD application rather than an open -ended retail CMP amendment. McMillan stated <br />there is no guarantee that the food co -op will be constructed on this site and that the amendment would <br />leave it open to a number of different retail uses. <br />Johnston stated they did meet with City Staff months ago when the two uses for this site came up and that <br />the food co -op did not have the resources to submit a full PUD application at that time without some idea • <br />of the support by the City for that use. Johnston stated the direction they were given is that if they cannot <br />PAGE 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.