My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-04-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
05-04-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:07:23 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:49:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t . <br />• <br />1� <br />• <br />ORONO CITY C <br />Monday, <br />7:00 o' <br />( #07 -3277 Susan Nelson, Continued) <br />Bremer stated she would be fine with allowing the <br />given the configuration of the house and lot. <br />Nelson inquired whether a roof could be <br />Turner stated it cannot. <br />OF THE <br />fNCIL MEETING <br />.y 14, 2007 <br />ck p.m. <br />variance for the addition along the property line <br />over the deck. <br />McMillan recommended the application be tabled to allow the applicant time to revise her plans. <br />McMillan moved to table Application #07 -3277, 500 Oxford Road. <br />'I <br />Nelson inquired whether the storage addition would be approved. <br />White suggested the Council approve the storage <br />No second to the above motion. <br />Bremer moved, Murphy seconded, Application <br />variance and to deny the dining room addition <br />setback. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2, Rahn and Mc <br />14. #07 -3278 JOHN TERRANCE HOMES, <br />AMENDMENT <br />Steve Johnston of John Terrance Homes was <br />Gaffron stated the Planning Commission voted 6 -0 <br />amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to allow ret <br />proposed re- instatement of Amendment #2 languag <br />requirement, eliminating the limit on individual ten <br />buildings, retail or otherwise. <br />The amendment as initially proposed does not pr, <br />Council has been taking in terms of retail on this <br />recently rescinded be reinstated with three minor <br />Staff met with Steve Johnston and representatives <br />the applicants to address the six impact questions t <br />and noted that the Council will be asked to look at <br />concentrating on the two specific uses being propc <br />suggesting new comprehensive plan language that <br />merely requesting that the rescinded language be r <br />and deny the dining room addition. <br />17 -3277, 500 Oxford Road, to approve the storage <br />the extent that it encroaches into the side yard <br />Ulan Opposed. <br />KELLEY PARKWAY — CMP <br />a motion to recommend approval of an <br />uses on Outlot A, generally per the applicants' <br />eliminating the pharmacy /convenience store <br />t spaces, and eliminating any size limits on <br />language supportive of the position that the <br />The applicants are suggesting that the language <br />the bank and food co -op on April 26`x'. Staff advised <br />t the Planning Commission was asked to address, <br />overall concept of retail versus office, rather than <br />3. Staff also advised the applicants to consider <br />pports their proposed amendment, as opposed to <br />PAGE 19 <br />i., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.